Re: [sword-devel] IMP format for Daily Devotionals?

2016-02-10 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 02/10/2016 08:27 AM, David Haslam wrote: > Are month heading keys valid with the key $$$mm.00 ? A daily.dev is a dictionary module with odd keys. You can encode $$$mm.00 if you wish, and if you display that daily.dev in an app's usual dictionary pane, you can surely navigate to mm.00. But I'm

Re: [sword-devel] IMP format for Daily Devotionals?

2016-02-10 Thread David Haslam
So would the solution to include month headings (etc.) be to go to a proper OSIS XML source file, rather than to use IMP with either ThML or OSIS fragments? I'm thinking of the original twelve subtitles, such as JANUARY THIS IS MY BELOVED SON, IN WHOM I AM WELL PLEASED. HEAR YE HIM.

Re: [sword-devel] IMP format for Daily Devotionals?

2016-02-10 Thread DM Smith
If it is added, how would the front-end use it? Bible Desktop automatically goes to the current date in the user’s default daily devotional upon startup. Would it show the intro on the first of the month? With every day of the month? Having it in the first day entry ensures that it is seen.

[sword-devel] IMP format for Daily Devotionals?

2016-02-10 Thread David Haslam
See http://crosswire.org/wiki/DevTools:Modules#IMP_Format For daily devotionals, you must encode the key as "$$$mm.dd". Question: Are month heading keys valid with the key $$$mm.00 ? And is a general introduction feasible under the key $$$00.00 ? i.e. By analogy with the way IMP format

Re: [sword-devel] IMP format for Daily Devotionals?

2016-02-10 Thread DM Smith
Simple enough: One would put a month heading in mm.01 as a heading using the proper markup for the module whether ThML, TEI, OSIS, … Every dictionary supports a module introduction. It is an unsorted first entry. I have no idea how one specifies that the first key of the module is an intro.

Re: [sword-devel] IMP format for Daily Devotionals?

2016-02-10 Thread DM Smith
> On Feb 10, 2016, at 9:00 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > > On 02/10/2016 08:27 AM, David Haslam wrote: >> Are month heading keys valid with the key $$$mm.00 ? > A daily.dev is a dictionary module with odd keys. You can encode $$$mm.00 if > you wish, and if you display that

Re: [sword-devel] IMP format for Daily Devotionals?

2016-02-10 Thread Peter von Kaehne
David is right though, a intro would be a suitable thing in so many way and many use it. E.g. the Herrnhuther Losungen come with a year's losung and a month's one and a monthly psalm., So using the chapter/verses 0 logic from bibles does make sense. Sent from my phone. Apologies for brevity

Re: [sword-devel] IMP format for Daily Devotionals?

2016-02-10 Thread Peter Von Kaehne
. For others, it clearly would not.   Maybe the whole thing needs more thought   Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2016 um 18:03 Uhr Von: "Karl Kleinpaste" <k...@kleinpaste.org> An: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" <sword-devel@crosswire.org> Betreff: Re: [s

Re: [sword-devel] IMP format for Daily Devotionals?

2016-02-10 Thread DM Smith
t; Maybe the whole thing needs more thought >> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2016 um 18:03 Uhr >> Von: "Karl Kleinpaste" <k...@kleinpaste.org> >> An: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" <sword-devel@crosswire.org> >> Betreff: R

Re: [sword-devel] IMP format for Daily Devotionals?

2016-02-10 Thread David Haslam
Putting it in mm.01 implies that it only belongs to the first of the month. In the 1842 original these headings were at the top of each month's table. David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/IMP-format-for-Daily-Devotionals-tp4656074p4656085.html Sent

Re: [sword-devel] IMP format for Daily Devotionals?

2016-02-10 Thread Greg Hellings
the whole thing needs more thought > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2016 um 18:03 Uhr > Von: "Karl Kleinpaste" <k...@kleinpaste.org> > An: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" <sword-devel@crosswire.org> > Betreff: Re: [sword-devel] IMP format for Da

Re: [sword-devel] IMP format for Daily Devotionals?

2016-02-10 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 02/10/2016 12:23 PM, David Haslam wrote: > Putting it in mm.01 implies that it only belongs to the first of the month. > In the 1842 original these headings were at the top of each month's table. It seems to me that this is a sort of semantic gap between original paper publication and how the