Re: [sword-devel] Question about backwards compatibility and search index download-ability, especially in relation to low-cost, low-power computers (such as might be in developing countries?)

2019-04-07 Thread DM Smith
I maintain JSword. We try to maintain backward compatibility with the lowest common denominator version of Java on devices that are up to 10 years old for computers and 5 years for mobiles. The OS version needs to be vendor supported. Android at this point is our boat anchor. For me the most

[sword-devel] Question about backwards compatibility and search index download-ability, especially in relation to low-cost, low-power computers (such as might be in developing countries?)

2019-04-07 Thread TS
Hi, To put it simply, I was wondering what is Crosswire's or perhaps Troy's position on backwards compatibility. I thought that the desired goal, if possible, was for Sword to be able to run on as many devices as possible. However, recently I've seen in mailing list postings or emails