Jonathan Morgan wrote:
If you really wish to match a print version exactly, you will also
need to reckon with translations like Moffat's
Please do not forget there is a second mechanism for alternative canons
- the GenBook Bibles, which allows completely arbitrary ordering of
books, chapters
Hi there ...
Daniel Owens wrote:
I need to find a printed Bible with the 151st Psalm to verify this,
but my suspicion is that it is not a separate book but just an additional psalm.
Psalm 151 does not appear in Catholic bibles. It is in protestant
bibles with apocrypha usually in the
The following is just to keep in mind - it comes from my copy of the
Jerusalem Bible as printed by Doubleday (US Publishers). I can't find
any indication of what printing this might have come from and the only
copyright date in the front reads 1966, which is the first copyright
date leading me to
Hi Greg ...
Greg Hellings wrote:
as it is in my NRSV, as are 148-150. There is no mention of 151, but
I have no idea if it's one of the ones sort of wedged into their
otherwise strange versification.
Not all that strange - it's been around for 1600 years or so! But,
sadly Ps 151
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Barry Drake bdr...@crosswire.org wrote:
Hi Greg ...
Greg Hellings wrote:
as it is in my NRSV, as are 148-150. There is no mention of 151, but
I have no idea if it's one of the ones sort of wedged into their
otherwise strange versification.
Not all that
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 01:42, Greg Hellings wrote:
as it is in my NRSV, as are 148-150. There is no mention of 151, but I have
no idea if it's one of the ones sort of wedged into their otherwise strange
versification.
There are two major v11n schemes for Psalms. The one that Jews use,
and
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:33 AM, jonathon jonathon.bl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 01:42, Greg Hellings wrote:
as it is in my NRSV, as are 148-150. There is no mention of 151, but I have
no idea if it's one of the ones sort of wedged into their otherwise strange
It still seems clear, to me, that there are a large number of
technical difficulties as we climb outward in our search to support
everyone's canon. I'm guessing a mapping mechanism will have to wait
until we have determined our full support extent and, even then, will
be non-trivial to
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Ben Morgan benpmor...@gmail.com wrote:
It still seems clear, to me, that there are a large number of
technical difficulties as we climb outward in our search to support
everyone's canon. I'm guessing a mapping mechanism will have to wait
until we have
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Greg Hellings greg.helli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:33 AM, jonathon jonathon.bl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 01:42, Greg Hellings wrote:
as it is in my NRSV, as are 148-150. There is no mention of 151, but I
have no idea if
I've noticed a couple of locales now in SVN that have problems from the
perspective of Sword's verse parser. Sword's verse parser looks for the
first non-initial digit in a verse reference and interprets this as the
beginning of a chapter number. So 1Kings or 2Baruch are fine, since the
digits
-
From: Chris Little chris...@crosswire.org
To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum sword-devel@crosswire.org
Sent: 5/7/09 3:46 AM
Subject: [sword-devel] SWORD 1.6.x Localization (Ps 151)
I've noticed a couple of locales now in SVN that have problems from the
perspective of Sword's verse
Daniel,
It depends on the Bible. In the case of the NRSV, Psalm 151 is a
separate book within the intertestamental group of books. In other
traditions, it's simply the 151st chapter of Psalms. Traditions that
include Psalms 152-155 can likewise present 151-155 as a separate book
or
13 matches
Mail list logo
