On 8.3.2012 11:46, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
Thanks, I was unclear. I was not arguing against copyright in Bibles
generally (though I do not like it, it's a separate issue).
I am always haunted by the image of the prophet Jeremiah sitting in
front of the gates of Jerusalem asking for the
Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com writes:
I am always haunted by the image of the prophet Jeremiah sitting in
front of the gates of Jerusalem asking for the royalties on his
prophecies.
I don't know how Jeremiah made his living, but the scribes who made
copies of his prophecies available to others
On 03/07/2012 09:04 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
On 8.3.2012 07:14, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
The #1 reason they give me for copyrighting Bibles is that they want
some way to protect the text from corruption. Arguments to the
contrary are futile.
Can I ask for clarification here? Is the
Michael asks,
Is there any way we can tag a module as being of a version that requires
support for alternate versification and/or support for RtoL scripts?
Then only front ends with that capability could display it, and we wouldn't
have to withhold the module from the front ends that don't.
We
Michael asks,
Just how serious is it if the versification isn't KJV-only? Will 3 John
1:15 or Romans 14:24-26 be discarded or fail to display?
The documented action of our module creation tools already addresses what
happens if a passage falls beyond the specified v11n.
The verse text is
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 22:13 -1000, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
I'm not really asking if The Sword Project is 100% bug free, but I'm testing
the waters to see if there is really an awareness here of the seriousness of
the importance of preserving all of the jots and tittles of Bible
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 00:22 -0800, David Haslam wrote:
Michael asks,
Is there any way we can tag a module as being of a version that requires
support for alternate versification and/or support for RtoL scripts?
Then only front ends with that capability could display it, and we wouldn't
have
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson
kahunap...@mpj.cx wrote:
On 03/07/2012 04:53 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
... I'm suggesting copyright is the wrong tool to use to enforce such
claims, since I can't see that it will actually target the one responsible
Kahunapule Michael Johnson kahunap...@mpj.cx writes:
Chronic or excessive bugs, or bugs that are serious but don't get
fixed are a major problem.
Designed-in bugs that don't get fixed are show-stopper problems.
I would be interested in -- entertained by -- even one example of any
Sword program
On 03/08/2012 03:53 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
Howzabout you grant us a smidgen of respect for the positively alarming
amount of effort that gets put into our collective software efforts and
our collective module creation skills. Waddayasay you don't use as your
starting assumption that we
On 03/06/2012 04:12 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:17 AM,
Kahunapule Michael Johnson kahunap...@mpj.cx
wrote:
On 03/06/2012 12:47 AM, Jonathan Morgan
wrote:
On 03/07/2012 02:46 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
On 03/06/2012 04:12 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson
kahunap...@mpj.cx mailto:kahunap...@mpj.cx wrote:
On 03/06/2012 12:47 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
1. You
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson
kahunap...@mpj.cx wrote:
On 03/06/2012 04:12 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson
kahunap...@mpj.cx wrote:
On 03/06/2012 12:47 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
1. You
On 03/07/2012 04:53 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
... I'm suggesting copyright is the wrong tool to use to
enforce such claims, since I can't see that it will actually
target the one responsible for the wrong. I agree quality
control is a
On 8.3.2012 07:14, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
The #1 reason they give me for copyrighting Bibles is that they want
some way to protect the text from corruption. Arguments to the
contrary are futile.
Can I ask for clarification here? Is the problem existence of bugs in
software or
On 06/03/12 01:42, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
It is most likely a misunderstanding. Perhaps I have also been
misunderstanding some of the messages that seem to be opposed to USFM.
I'm not trying to suggest that USFM be made an additional internal
format for Sword for Bible search and
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson
kahunap...@mpj.cx wrote:
On 03/05/2012 08:07 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
On 05/03/12 17:33, Greg Hellings wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Kahunapule Michael
Johnsonkahunap...@mpj.cx kahunap...@mpj.cx wrote:
On 03/06/2012 12:47 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
You accurately preserve all of the original text and
punctuation (including quotation punctuation) exactly as
it was in the original USFM. This involves the complete
All front ends should display all text with the punctuation as given.
Anything other than that is a bug that must be fixed.
They will differ on their styling of that text.
On 03/06/2012 02:17 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
On 03/06/2012 12:47 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
1. You
On 03/05/2012 09:59 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
...
I'm trying to convert Scripture files on a scale and with speed that
is apparently unprecedented.
The scale might be unprecedent, but there are reasons for that
1) None of us have yet encountered a USFM text which is actually clean.
It
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson
kahunap...@mpj.cx wrote:
On 03/06/2012 12:47 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
1. You accurately preserve all of the original text and punctuation
(including quotation punctuation) exactly as it was in the original USFM.
This
On 03/05/2012 08:07 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
On 05/03/12 17:33, Greg Hellings wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson
kahunap...@mpj.cx wrote:
On 03/05/2012 03:20 AM, Greg Hellings wrote:
22 matches
Mail list logo
