Re: [sword-devel] plain filters

2013-06-24 Thread DM Smith
Do we have any plain text modules any more? Have any of the former plain text module been withdrawn w/o being replaced with another format? That is are there any legacy reasons to support that module format? I'm asking as JSword provides limited support (newlines are retained in the display,

Re: [sword-devel] plain filters

2013-06-24 Thread David Haslam
Someone could easily count how many by creating a script to find out how many modules have *SourceType=PlainText* in the conf file. Such a script is probably a one liner in Perl. A bit more ingenuity would output a counted list of all the source types found in each repository. David --

Re: [sword-devel] plain filters

2013-06-24 Thread Chris Little
On 6/24/2013 5:05 AM, David Haslam wrote: Someone could easily count how many by creating a script to find out how many modules have *SourceType=PlainText* in the conf file. Such a script is probably a one liner in Perl. A bit more ingenuity would output a counted list of all the source types

Re: [sword-devel] plain filters

2013-06-24 Thread DM Smith
On Jun 24, 2013, at 8:18 AM, Chris Little chris...@crosswire.org wrote: On 6/24/2013 5:05 AM, David Haslam wrote: Someone could easily count how many by creating a script to find out how many modules have *SourceType=PlainText* in the conf file. Such a script is probably a one liner in

[sword-devel] plain filters

2013-06-23 Thread Chris Little
Does anyone have an objection to the complete removal of the plain filters (PLAINHTML and PLAINFOOTNOTES)? These are all kinds of bad. They essentially serve to style plaintext modules and toggle footnotes in plaintext modules, and they achieve this by making big assumptions that are unlikely