Matthew Talbert wrote:
I could, but I think it is a low priority for me and for the Xiphos folk.
(Who may not want to know if it works there ;)
If it works, would that mean we would have to support it? (desperately
praying it won't!!)
I have made for the wiki an executive decision and a
Hi Peter .
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
why are you concerned? Fix it please.
Please accept my apologies. I didn't mean to criticise, just to make
observations.
I haven't yet looked at altering the Wiki, and just now, I'm very pushed
for time. But yes - I do realise that this is not in its
Quoting Barry Drake bdr...@crosswire.org:
I suggest an additional column (or more). 'Footnote Handling' marked
as 'complete' or 'limited' (or somesuch). Another point that we might
want to consider is navigation on a scale of 0 to 5. BibleCS might be
around 2, and Xiphos around 5 and
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
Quoting Barry Drake bdr...@crosswire.org:
I suggest an additional column (or more). 'Footnote Handling' marked
as 'complete' or 'limited' (or somesuch). Another point that we might
want to consider is navigation on a scale of 0 to 5. BibleCS might be
around 2, and
On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Putting data into rows and frontends into columns is so obvious that I
feel now stupid. It is probably too late to fix this for the wiki -
unless you, Eeli, volunteer - the amount has become too much.
I'll see about doing this.
-- DM
Barry Drake bdr...@crosswire.org writes:
BibleCS limits footnotes to 1221 characters. Some of our footnotes
are at least double that; I've no idea how big the longest is.
Eccl 1:1#1, 6559 characters as rendered in Xiphos; original source
markup, somewhat larger.
Hi Peter ..
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Wrt rating of interfaces - sorry, Barry I really can not see how we can
put this anywhere without the most almighty flame war.
I agree with you. In this instance, I was just thinking back to a
number of feature requests aimed at BibleCS because
DM Smith wrote:
On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Putting data into rows and frontends into columns is so obvious that I
feel now stupid. It is probably too late to fix this for the wiki -
unless you, Eeli, volunteer - the amount has become too much.
I'll see about doing
DM,
Just a few notes on the layout; these changes look great, and the table
is definitely easier to read. I do agree that the columns are too narrow.
I was recently looking at this wiki page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_browsers
The comparison tables on this page look
Brian Fernandes wrote:
DM,
Just a few notes on the layout; these changes look great, and the table
is definitely easier to read. I do agree that the columns are too narrow.
Seconded.
I was recently looking at this wiki page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_browsers
The
Brian Fernandes wrote:
Unfortunately I could not figure out how to easily import the {{yes}} /
{{no}} templates into our Wiki, perhaps best left to someone with more
experience. I can try again later tomorrow if nobody gets to it by then
- if you think this is a good idea.
I have created a
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
The OS support I would simply do as previous - one row only, but maybe
with icons to make faster to read. Win95+ or WinXP+ is adequate instead
of a whole list of variants (unless newer Wins do not work).
This may seem a minor matter, but I'm not sure whether the
Chris Little wrote:
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
The OS support I would simply do as previous - one row only, but maybe
with icons to make faster to read. Win95+ or WinXP+ is adequate instead
of a whole list of variants (unless newer Wins do not work).
This may seem a minor matter, but I'm not
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Brian Fernandes wrote:
Unfortunately I could not figure out how to easily import the {{yes}} /
{{no}} templates into our Wiki, perhaps best left to someone with more
experience. I can try again later tomorrow if nobody gets to it by then
- if you think this is a good
The table is taking shape nicely. Don't feel like you need to use the
graphics just cause they are there.
Nice work everyone.
Daniel Blake
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Brian Fernandes wrote:
Unfortunately I could not figure out how to easily import the {{yes}} /
{{no}} templates into our
On Mar 2, 2009, at 5:58 PM, DM Smith wrote:
With sorting the page is too wide to print in landscape without
truncation.
Never mind. It shrinks nicely.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
Chris Little wrote:
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
The OS support I would simply do as previous - one row only, but maybe
with icons to make faster to read. Win95+ or WinXP+ is adequate instead
of a whole list of variants (unless newer Wins do not work).
This may seem a minor matter, but I'm
On Mar 2, 2009, at 7:36 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Chris Little wrote:
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
The OS support I would simply do as previous - one row only, but
maybe
with icons to make faster to read. Win95+ or WinXP+ is adequate
instead
of a whole list of variants (unless newer Wins
DM Smith wrote:
I have a Windows 98 laptop
Could you for curiosity sake test xiphos on it?
Peter
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your
Could you for curiosity sake test xiphos on it?
I can almost 100% guarantee it won't work. There are Windows api
functions being used that were simply non-existent back then.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:02 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
DM Smith wrote:
I have a Windows 98 laptop
Could you for curiosity sake test xiphos on it?
I could, but I think it is a low priority for me and for the Xiphos
folk. (Who may not want to know if it works there ;)
-- DM
I could, but I think it is a low priority for me and for the Xiphos folk.
(Who may not want to know if it works there ;)
If it works, would that mean we would have to support it? (desperately
praying it won't!!)
Matthew
___
sword-devel mailing list:
Peter,
Truly a great effort and a good list of features for frontend authors to
refer to and improve.
I want to edit the FireBible rows a bit, but would like to make a few
clarifications first; I will wait for your response before editing the
tables or you can go ahead and edit it yourself.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Brian Fernandes
infernalprot...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter,
Truly a great effort and a good list of features for frontend authors to
refer to and improve.
I want to edit the FireBible rows a bit, but would like to make a few
clarifications first; I will wait for
Hi there .
I've only just had chance to take a proper look at the Wiki page. It
seems good as far as it goes, but I'm very concerned about the things it
doesn't compare. I know I keep going on about BibleCS and NET, but that
is an important issue to me. Load NET and look at Gen 1:26.
Peter, (and others)
A couple of thoughts regarding this wiki.
First, I think it is going very well. Kudos to all that have helped. I
can see a lot of effort has gone into this!
I think it would be good to have an explanation of the column headings
under each table. Many of the headings are
Barry Drake wrote:
Hi there .
I've only just had chance to take a proper look at the Wiki page. It
seems good as far as it goes, but I'm very concerned about the things it
doesn't compare.
why are you concerned? Fix it please. The bulk of the table was produced
by myself last night in
DM Smith wrote:
Peter, (and others)
A couple of thoughts regarding this wiki.
First, I think it is going very well. Kudos to all that have helped. I
can see a lot of effort has gone into this!
Thanks
I think it would be good to have an explanation of the column headings
under each
Thanks Brian,
Brian Fernandes wrote:
Peter,
Truly a great effort and a good list of features for frontend authors to
refer to and improve.
It started as a way for users to compare, but I think ultimatrely it
will be much more useful to developers etc.
I want to edit the FireBible rows
Peter,
You've sure taken this page farther than I had--great job. You thought of MANY
things I overlooked.
Ideally the wiki should serve as the data for a SWORD Program chooser like some
Linux distribution choosers out there that perhaps could be housed on the main
website and included with
30 matches
Mail list logo
