Re: [sword-devel] image support

2007-09-11 Thread Chris Little
Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> If a module is primarily a set of maps, it should use Category=Maps. >> If a module is primarily a set of [images], it should use Category=Images. > > So obviously BAO should gain "Feature=Images" and "Category=Maps" (and > its

Re: [sword-devel] image support

2007-09-11 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If a module contains images of any type and in any quantity, then > Feature=Images should be added to the .conf. A module that just contains > maps, a commentary with the occasional image, etc. should all employ > this feature. OK, I'll update a bunch

Re: [sword-devel] image support

2007-09-09 Thread David
Been a while since I've been on here. But I played with this a little a good while back. There should be a map module somewhere that I used to test with. Anyway, from what I can remember, there are a couple of problems. 1. BibleCS wants to convert images to rtf. Which if it is a large image can tak

Re: [sword-devel] image support

2007-09-09 Thread Chris Little
I've added a Feature, "Images" and two Category values, "Maps" and "Images" to the Wiki. The usage should be as follows: If a module contains images of any type and in any quantity, then Feature=Images should be added to the .conf. A module that just contains maps, a commentary with the occasio

Re: [sword-devel] image support

2007-09-07 Thread DM Smith
Assuming it works, can we move the module BAO out of beta? On Sep 7, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Chris Little wrote: > Karl Kleinpaste wrote: >> WinSword, of course, doesn't yet do images at all, and I really >> think it >> needs the ability. > > As with other engine-related features, BibleCS supported

Re: [sword-devel] image support

2007-09-07 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I couldn't guess why it's broken at the moment. Hm, interesting. I've been involved with Sword things since April '06, and I have never seen the Windows UI do images. So it has been broken for at least the duration of the 1.5.8 and now 1.5.9 releases.

Re: [sword-devel] image support

2007-09-07 Thread Jonathan Morgan
On 9/8/07, Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > > WinSword, of course, doesn't yet do images at all, and I really think it > > needs the ability. > > As with other engine-related features, BibleCS supported images first. I > couldn't guess why it's broken at the moment

Re: [sword-devel] image support

2007-09-07 Thread Chris Little
Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > WinSword, of course, doesn't yet do images at all, and I really think it > needs the ability. As with other engine-related features, BibleCS supported images first. I couldn't guess why it's broken at the moment. --Chris ___ s

Re: [sword-devel] image support

2007-09-07 Thread DM Smith
I would like to suggest a new "Feature" in the conf of "Images" to indicate that the module has images. Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > I hesitate to ask for much more in the way of new feature support, > considering that Troy has graciously reacted so well to my previous > agitation about a new release

Re: [sword-devel] image support

2007-09-07 Thread Martin Gruner
Hi Karl, please enter this into our feature request tracker at sourceforge. We'll add it when we have the time. mg am Freitag, 7. September 2007 um 15:24 schrieben Sie: > I hesitate to ask for much more in the way of new feature support, > considering that Troy has graciously reacted so well to

Re: [sword-devel] image support

2007-09-07 Thread Eeli Kaikkonen
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > also, I am aware that BibleTime does images, but doesn't > offer resizing, which is a feature that I wish that crew would consider. This sounds like a must-have feature. If we only would get the KDE 4 porting done soon! Then we could think about feature

Re: [sword-devel] image support and UI selection (Re: JSword and development progress)

2006-08-28 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
Barry Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This may be a silly thought but - how about making the tag in the > module a URL. > The frontend could then fire up the default browser I'm one of those odd folk that dislike a web browser being regarded as a universal application interface. At the least,

Re: [sword-devel] image support and UI selection (Re: JSword and development progress)

2006-08-28 Thread Barry Drake
Hi DM .. DM Smith wrote: > I think you have mentioned a couple of good ideas here: > a) Display in a separate window. > b) scale the image. This may be a silly thought but - how about making the tag in the module a URL. For a local file it could be file:///[sword_path]/[path_to_im

Re: [sword-devel] image support and UI selection (Re: JSword and development progress)

2006-08-28 Thread DM Smith
Karl, I think you have mentioned a couple of good ideas here: a) Display in a separate window. b) scale the image. That got me thinking and I think of a couple more: c) optional images d) place holders for images. Perhaps these go together as the caption should be handled as part