Ok,
Thanks to mwtalbert who made me aware of the exchange attached below.
The script is still in ghellings files. It does not work as it requires
some Perl modules which appears not to be available.
I would be extremely grateful if someone could look into what is needed
to make it work. I
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
re module stats
I have been searching widely tonight again through the website with
regard to the module stats but remain without answers.
ok. Got the answer, Thanks Mwtalbert. The original perl scripts were
defunct since March 2008 (?)
Ghellings has written
Hi Peter,
I did the first version of that script years ago. DM did some fixes not too
long ago, I think.
The error message says that the perl module readbackwards is not yet
installed. I think that it should be available in Fedora. Troy has to install
the package.
The generated HTML can be
Joachim Ansorg wrote:
Hi Peter,
I did the first version of that script years ago. DM did some fixes not too
long ago, I think.
The error message says that the perl module readbackwards is not yet
installed. I think that it should be available in Fedora. Troy has to install
the package.
2008/12/28 Chris Little chris...@crosswire.org:
This page is probably worth pointing out:
http://wiki.volxbibel.com/index.php/Volxbibel_f%C3%BCr_das_SWORD_Projekt
The actual link (I believe to a Zefania page) is down, and only ever
contained the version 1 Bible (which is now up to version 3),
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Peter von Kaehne ref...@gmx.net wrote:
Joachim Ansorg wrote:
Hi Peter,
I did the first version of that script years ago. DM did some fixes not too
long ago, I think.
The error message says that the perl module readbackwards is not yet
installed. I think that
There are lots of undecoded codepoints in the text! Here are some examples
from Matthew ch 1.
http://www.nabble.com/file/p21209279/vlx3_codepoints.png
-- David
Wolfgang Schultz-2 wrote:
the version 3 of the volxbibel is now available for sword :-))
David Haslam wrote:
There are lots of undecoded codepoints in the text! Here are some examples
from Matthew ch 1.
http://www.nabble.com/file/p21209279/vlx3_codepoints.png
-- David
It is a lot better to go directly from the Wiki to OSIS. I can not see
any good reason to use Xephania as a
I quite agree!
Their way of working seems odd to say the least.
Everytime they do a format shift in this way, we find another few codepoints
they forgot to cater for in their complicated (and almost unreadable)
SED-based scripts.
IMHO, there is nothing to be gained by shifting from Unicode to
be the appropriate
place to ask. But it doesn't, so here is probably the best place.
Here is the text (Indonesia KJV, only Matt chapter 1 and half chapter
2 :) that I will be based my questions
http://www.kiyut.com/products/alkitab/developer/sourcecode/IndKJV-20081229.zip
or in the attachment if this mailing
David Haslam wrote:
... in their complicated (and almost unreadable)
SED-based scripts.
Sed scripts can be cool. Ask Karl for some of his specials.
Peter
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
Neither Wolfgang's module nor Jan's ThML include any of the footnotes or
section headings, so neither of them are particularly representative of
the VolxBibel or of particular utility to us.
--Chris
David Haslam wrote:
I quite agree!
Their way of working seems odd to say the least.
Chris Little wrote:
Neither Wolfgang's module nor Jan's ThML include any of the footnotes or
section headings, so neither of them are particularly representative of
the VolxBibel or of particular utility to us.
The point being that Jan's ThML is meant for a frontend which does not
do foot
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Chris Little wrote:
Neither Wolfgang's module nor Jan's ThML include any of the footnotes or
section headings, so neither of them are particularly representative of
the VolxBibel or of particular utility to us.
The point being that Jan's ThML is meant for a frontend
will be based my questions
http://www.kiyut.com/products/alkitab/developer/sourcecode/IndKJV-20081229.zip
or in the attachment if this mailing list allow attachment
As a rule, sending attachments to mailing lists (especially those with
large subscriberships) should always be avoided. Links
.
Here is the text (Indonesia KJV, only Matt chapter 1 and half chapter
2 :) that I will be based my questions
http://www.kiyut.com/products/alkitab/developer/sourcecode/IndKJV-20081229.zip
or in the attachment if this mailing list allow attachment
As a rule, sending attachments to mailing
16 matches
Mail list logo
