Hi Peter .
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
why are you concerned? Fix it please.
Please accept my apologies. I didn't mean to criticise, just to make
observations.
I haven't yet looked at altering the Wiki, and just now, I'm very pushed
for time. But yes - I do realise that this is not in its
Quoting Barry Drake bdr...@crosswire.org:
I suggest an additional column (or more). 'Footnote Handling' marked
as 'complete' or 'limited' (or somesuch). Another point that we might
want to consider is navigation on a scale of 0 to 5. BibleCS might be
around 2, and Xiphos around 5 and
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
Quoting Barry Drake bdr...@crosswire.org:
I suggest an additional column (or more). 'Footnote Handling' marked
as 'complete' or 'limited' (or somesuch). Another point that we might
want to consider is navigation on a scale of 0 to 5. BibleCS might be
around 2, and
On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Putting data into rows and frontends into columns is so obvious that I
feel now stupid. It is probably too late to fix this for the wiki -
unless you, Eeli, volunteer - the amount has become too much.
I'll see about doing this.
-- DM
Barry Drake bdr...@crosswire.org writes:
BibleCS limits footnotes to 1221 characters. Some of our footnotes
are at least double that; I've no idea how big the longest is.
Eccl 1:1#1, 6559 characters as rendered in Xiphos; original source
markup, somewhat larger.
Hi Peter ..
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Wrt rating of interfaces - sorry, Barry I really can not see how we can
put this anywhere without the most almighty flame war.
I agree with you. In this instance, I was just thinking back to a
number of feature requests aimed at BibleCS because
Here you go Peter,
Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. I'd fallen and couldn't reach my
keyboard :-)
Daniel Blake
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Dan Blake wrote:
Eeli mentioned using graphics for some of the items to conserve space.
Here are very small graphics for supported operating
DM Smith wrote:
On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Putting data into rows and frontends into columns is so obvious that I
feel now stupid. It is probably too late to fix this for the wiki -
unless you, Eeli, volunteer - the amount has become too much.
I'll see about doing
DM,
Just a few notes on the layout; these changes look great, and the table
is definitely easier to read. I do agree that the columns are too narrow.
I was recently looking at this wiki page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_browsers
The comparison tables on this page look
Brian Fernandes wrote:
DM,
Just a few notes on the layout; these changes look great, and the table
is definitely easier to read. I do agree that the columns are too narrow.
Seconded.
I was recently looking at this wiki page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_browsers
The
Brian Fernandes wrote:
Unfortunately I could not figure out how to easily import the {{yes}} /
{{no}} templates into our Wiki, perhaps best left to someone with more
experience. I can try again later tomorrow if nobody gets to it by then
- if you think this is a good idea.
I have created a
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
The OS support I would simply do as previous - one row only, but maybe
with icons to make faster to read. Win95+ or WinXP+ is adequate instead
of a whole list of variants (unless newer Wins do not work).
This may seem a minor matter, but I'm not sure whether the
Chris Little wrote:
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
The OS support I would simply do as previous - one row only, but maybe
with icons to make faster to read. Win95+ or WinXP+ is adequate instead
of a whole list of variants (unless newer Wins do not work).
This may seem a minor matter, but I'm not
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Brian Fernandes wrote:
Unfortunately I could not figure out how to easily import the {{yes}} /
{{no}} templates into our Wiki, perhaps best left to someone with more
experience. I can try again later tomorrow if nobody gets to it by then
- if you think this is a good
The table is taking shape nicely. Don't feel like you need to use the
graphics just cause they are there.
Nice work everyone.
Daniel Blake
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Brian Fernandes wrote:
Unfortunately I could not figure out how to easily import the {{yes}} /
{{no}} templates into our
On Mar 2, 2009, at 5:58 PM, DM Smith wrote:
With sorting the page is too wide to print in landscape without
truncation.
Never mind. It shrinks nicely.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
Chris Little wrote:
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
The OS support I would simply do as previous - one row only, but maybe
with icons to make faster to read. Win95+ or WinXP+ is adequate instead
of a whole list of variants (unless newer Wins do not work).
This may seem a minor matter, but I'm
On Mar 2, 2009, at 7:36 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Chris Little wrote:
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
The OS support I would simply do as previous - one row only, but
maybe
with icons to make faster to read. Win95+ or WinXP+ is adequate
instead
of a whole list of variants (unless newer Wins
DM Smith wrote:
I have a Windows 98 laptop
Could you for curiosity sake test xiphos on it?
Peter
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your
Could you for curiosity sake test xiphos on it?
I can almost 100% guarantee it won't work. There are Windows api
functions being used that were simply non-existent back then.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:02 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
DM Smith wrote:
I have a Windows 98 laptop
Could you for curiosity sake test xiphos on it?
I could, but I think it is a low priority for me and for the Xiphos
folk. (Who may not want to know if it works there ;)
-- DM
I could, but I think it is a low priority for me and for the Xiphos folk.
(Who may not want to know if it works there ;)
If it works, would that mean we would have to support it? (desperately
praying it won't!!)
Matthew
___
sword-devel mailing list:
We have a new pre-alpha BibleTime for Windows. Icons work now.
Bookshelf Manager doesn't crash anymore but the config dialog crashes
for me.
You can use
http://devel.bibletime.info/wiki/Building_on_Windows#Issues to quickly
report bugs.
- Forwarded message from
23 matches
Mail list logo
