[sword-devel] Milestoned forms of lg and l ?
I just spotted this line in the wiki While OSIS defines a milestoned version of the lg element, the use of it will not produce a valid XML document. See http://crosswire.org/wiki/OSIS_Bibles#Marking_poetic_material That's odd, isn't it? The OSIS manual clearly provides for milestoned forms of lg and l, so why would they fail to validate? Are there errors in http://www.bibletechnologies.net/osisCore.2.1.1.xsd or was this line in the wiki written well before version 2.1.1 of the schema? David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Milestoned-forms-of-lg-and-l-tp4247904p4247904.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
Re: [sword-devel] Milestoned forms of lg and l ?
They would not validate because the Schema is written to require an lg l / l / /lg structure. A line makes no sense in the absence of a group of lines. Other milestoned elements can make sense on their own but a line by itself does not. It might be possible for the schema to be updated to include the sequence of lg / l / l / lg / as a valid entry, but it would make the schema more complicated, especially if other tags are valid children of an lg / element. It does strike the XML purist in me as being a very bad abuse of XML to declare that something fits your requirements for XML but blatantly acknowledge that it does not match the provided schema. Then again, the XML purist in me dislikes XML in the first place. :) --Greg On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 2:45 AM, David Haslam dfh...@googlemail.com wrote: I just spotted this line in the wiki While OSIS defines a milestoned version of the lg element, the use of it will not produce a valid XML document. See http://crosswire.org/wiki/OSIS_Bibles#Marking_poetic_material That's odd, isn't it? The OSIS manual clearly provides for milestoned forms of lg and l, so why would they fail to validate? Are there errors in http://www.bibletechnologies.net/osisCore.2.1.1.xsd or was this line in the wiki written well before version 2.1.1 of the schema? David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Milestoned-forms-of-lg-and-l-tp4247904p4247904.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
Re: [sword-devel] Milestoned forms of lg and l ?
Thasnks for the explanation, Greg. I have just added a lightly edited copy of your first paragraph as a note in the wiki. http://crosswire.org/wiki/OSIS_Bibles#Marking_poetic_material David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Milestoned-forms-of-lg-and-l-tp4247904p4247992.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
Re: [sword-devel] osis2mod very happily generates modules with no text visible
Matěj Cepl wrote, - czap is an element for “text quoted by Czech apostrophe”, and I am not sure whether in all cases it means a quotation of the Old Testament text in the New Testament (as in this case). - All the instances of q marker=' ... /q are in the New Testament, so this seems very likely. Converting these to the milestoned form would be useful to prevent nesting errors if we wish to add other XML elements later. I have created a TextPipe subfilter that can do this. David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/osis2mod-very-happily-generates-modules-with-no-text-visible-tp4232587p4249115.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
Re: [sword-devel] Milestoned forms of lg and l ?
Greg's explanation was spot on. IMHO it is a bug in the spec. In His Service, DM Cent from my fone so theer mite be tipos. ;) On Dec 31, 2011, at 3:45 AM, David Haslam dfh...@googlemail.com wrote: I just spotted this line in the wiki While OSIS defines a milestoned version of the lg element, the use of it will not produce a valid XML document. See http://crosswire.org/wiki/OSIS_Bibles#Marking_poetic_material That's odd, isn't it? The OSIS manual clearly provides for milestoned forms of lg and l, so why would they fail to validate? Are there errors in http://www.bibletechnologies.net/osisCore.2.1.1.xsd or was this line in the wiki written well before version 2.1.1 of the schema? David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Milestoned-forms-of-lg-and-l-tp4247904p4247904.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
[sword-devel] Status of KJV2006: Underlying Greek text, editorial updates, and linking OT to Hebrew
Greetings DM, I'm inquiring about the KJV2006 projecthttp://www.crosswire.org/~dmsmith/kjv2006/ : 1) What Greek text is referenced by the w elements' @src attributes. Am I correct in assuming that the numbers in the @src attributes correspond to word positions in the corresponding verses in the Textus Receptus? Which digital edition of the TR are you keying off of? Is it the TRhttp://www.crosswire.org/sword/modules/ModInfo.jsp?modName=TRmodule? 2) I see that the Last-Modified time of the XML sources is Thu, 28 May 2009 21:49:36 GMT. Is this when the latest revisions have been applied? Are there ongoing efforts to refine the data? 3) Is there a goal to refine the OT morphology to provide @src for the Old Testament linkages to an available Masoretic Text, such as the Westminster Leningrad Codex? I am interested in supporting this. Happy new year! -- Weston Ruter http://weston.ruter.net/ @westonruter http://twitter.com/westonruter - Google Profilehttp://www.google.com/profiles/WestonRuter#about ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
