[sword-devel] SWORD 1.7.0 final stretch

2013-06-19 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Things have been quiet for a bit. I have all the patches in that are on my todo list. Anyone else have outstanding issues? Now is the time to speak up. Chris, any feedback on my Ralfs suggestion? Peter, still binding troubles? Can you give me your exact commands executed and I'll try them

[sword-devel] Service Temporarily Unavailable (CrossWire Tracker)

2013-06-19 Thread David Haslam
I was in the middle of editing a comment in the tracker, and just hit this: *Service Temporarily Unavailable* The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later. Apache/2.2.15 (Red Hat) Server at www.crosswire.org

Re: [sword-devel] Service Temporarily Unavailable (CrossWire Tracker)

2013-06-19 Thread David Haslam
Ignore that - I can access the tracker again. Sorry for the distraction. David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Service-Temporarily-Unavailable-CrossWire-Tracker-tp4652589p4652590.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [sword-devel] SWORD 1.7.0 final stretch

2013-06-19 Thread David Haslam
Hi Troy, I'm worried about a number of things relating to titles, but these worries are all focused on module build tools. i.e. How well the output from usfm2osis.py matches what osis2mod expects. Until this sleuthing is completed, and my evidence is presented to the right audience, I would not

Re: [sword-devel] SWORD 1.7.0 final stretch

2013-06-19 Thread DM Smith
As long as we follow the advice to have subsequent releases that fix bugs and minor details, I don't see any reason to wait. But I haven't had time to test the new KJV and ESV with it. I'll add my voice to a long list requesting branching for the release. Greg has volunteered to manage such. I

Re: [sword-devel] SWORD 1.7.0 final stretch

2013-06-19 Thread Mark Trompell
I would still like to have some feedback on attached patch to be able to use -DLIB_SUFFIX=64 to make make install install to prefix/lib64. Hardcoding lib is not good anyway, even if there might be better solutions than the one in the patch. But at least the provided one doesn't break existing

Re: [sword-devel] Current SVN

2013-06-19 Thread Chris Little
On 6/13/2013 2:58 PM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: Have projects had a chance to test against the latest SVN HEAD? I believe I still have a patch from Greg to find and we still have something outstanding for Peter to fix. Is anything else outstanding? I've had success building on Win32 in MSVC and

[sword-devel] Rahlfs LXX v11n (was Re: Current SVN)

2013-06-19 Thread DM Smith
I'd like more info on the LXX v11n. As I need to modify JSword for it. If I'm following, Rahlfs has separate books for some OT books? The question is whether we have them separate in the v11n or aliases? Does this implementation have any bearing on what is known to be deuterocanonical? That

Re: [sword-devel] SWORD 1.7.0 final stretch

2013-06-19 Thread Greg Hellings
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Mark Trompell m...@foresightlinux.orgwrote: I would still like to have some feedback on attached patch to be able to use -DLIB_SUFFIX=64 to make make install install to prefix/lib64. Hardcoding lib is not good anyway, even if there might be better solutions

Re: [sword-devel] cmake python bindings user location

2013-06-19 Thread Greg Hellings
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Ben crick...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/16/2013 11:55 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:22 PM, crick...@gmail.com mailto:crick...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Greg, I'm building the python bindings with cmake 2.6.4. I'm trying to

Re: [sword-devel] SWORD 1.7.0 final stretch

2013-06-19 Thread Chris Little
On 6/19/2013 1:45 AM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: Anything else? Let's push this to completion. I need your help. I wouldn't mind getting something in place to render the attribute included by the OSISEnum filter through the OSISXHTML filter. But I can foresee some pushback since that attribute

Re: [sword-devel] SWORD 1.7.0 final stretch

2013-06-19 Thread Greg Hellings
I believe today's commit lands all of the outstanding issues I have. It introduces enhanced functionality for CMake installs where the user does not want to install to ../lib and ../include. For those, in mirroring the behavior of autotools, the options LIBDIR=install directory and

Re: [sword-devel] Rahlfs LXX v11n (was Re: Current SVN)

2013-06-19 Thread Chris Little
On 6/19/2013 6:56 AM, DM Smith wrote: I'd like more info on the LXX v11n. As I need to modify JSword for it. If I'm following, Rahlfs has separate books for some OT books? The question is whether we have them separate in the v11n or aliases? Rahlfs' LXX is a critical edition, so in the case

Re: [sword-devel] cmake python bindings user location

2013-06-19 Thread Ben
On 06/19/2013 10:00 AM, Greg Hellings wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Ben crick...@gmail.com mailto:crick...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/16/2013 11:55 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:22 PM, crick...@gmail.com mailto:crick...@gmail.com

Re: [sword-devel] cmake python bindings user location

2013-06-19 Thread Greg Hellings
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Ben crick...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/19/2013 10:00 AM, Greg Hellings wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Ben crick...@gmail.com mailto:crick...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/16/2013 11:55 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:22