Re: [sword-devel] NASB

2017-02-24 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 02/24/2017 04:48 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote: > but who seem to grow weary or drop out when it comes to timely releases and > updates. ...as in, 2 years in need of a mere bugfix release. > I don't think we can expect to be taken as seriously as we would like to be. We are taken

Re: [sword-devel] NASB

2017-02-24 Thread Kahunapule Michael Johnson
A slight correction: I have an NASB Sword module, but haven't done anything with it, because it had no place to go. I don't think Lockman is interested either in distributing it for free or selling it, right now. Honestly, the length of time that has been taken on the NASB module is

Re: [sword-devel] NASB

2017-02-24 Thread Greg Hellings
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:22 PM, TS wrote: > From what I can tell, a member named Kahunapule Michael Johnson seems to > be able to already create a NASB Sword module. > > This is according to his post here and from last year as well. >

Re: [sword-devel] NASB

2017-02-24 Thread TS
From what I can tell, a member named Kahunapule Michael Johnson seems to be able to already create a NASB Sword module. This is according to his post here and from last year as well. http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/2017-January/044041.html I don’t quite understand why his posts