Re: [sword-devel] Suggestion for markup of Romans 3:26 in module KJV

David and I’ll look at this soon. We’ll try to figure out how this happened and whether the problem is bigger than this. — DM Smith > On Apr 3, 2021, at 5:40 PM, David Haslam wrote: > >  > Hi Troy, > > I will discuss the reported issue with DM as and when I have enough free > time. > >

Re: [sword-devel] Suggestion for markup of Romans 3:26 in module KJV

Troy, Again, thank you for the emergency fix. My apologies for the error. It’s my bad. It has taken some effort to find when and how it happened. The problem was introduced Feb 2013 by my hand edit to merge empty tags having G3588 with the appropriate having the following position.

Re: [sword-devel] Suggestion for markup of Romans 3:26 in module KJV

Dear Troy, Urgent! Please see my separate email just sent to you with cc to DM & Dom. Regards, David Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 03:41, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > I've just pushed an update (2.10) of our KJV module with the only change > between 2.9 and the new

Re: [sword-devel] Suggestion for markup of Romans 3:26 in module KJV

I've just pushed an update (2.10) of our KJV module with the only change between 2.9 and the new 2.10 being a manual check and correction of all Strong's 3688 numbers. Vladimir, thank you so much for reporting this problem.  DM and David are investigating further and will make any additional

Re: [sword-devel] Suggestion for markup of Romans 3:26 in module KJV

Hi Troy, I will discuss the reported issue with DM as and when I have enough free time. We should definitely not revert to 2.4 as that would simply undo all the good work from 2.5 through 2.9 If there’s a mistake, we can include the corrections in version 2.10 which is still in preparation

Re: [sword-devel] Suggestion for markup of Romans 3:26 in module KJV

The history of the module is listed in the wiki: https://wiki.crosswire.org/CrossWire_KJV#Module_Versions . That listing isn’t meant to be cryptic but rather complete. The version history in the conf is not as complete. We can make it

Re: [sword-devel] Suggestion for markup of Romans 3:26 in module KJV

David and I’ll look at this soon. We’ll try to figure out how this happened and whether the problem is bigger than this. — DM Smith > On Apr 3, 2021, at 5:40 PM, David Haslam wrote: > > Hi Troy, > > I will discuss the reported issue with DM as and when I have enough free > time. > > We

Re: [sword-devel] Suggestion for markup of Romans 3:26 in module KJV

A bit more investigation, this seems to be introduced between versions of our KJV 2.4 and 2.5. 2.4 reads correctly.  2.5 has this problem.  Unfortunately we have uninformative information in our History .conf entries between these versions. I am tempted to roll back this module to 2.4. Can

Re: [sword-devel] Suggestion for markup of Romans 3:26 in module KJV

This is a bit disturbing I just check our lastest KJV and TR modules (which was the base for the Strong's markup in the KJV). I can confirm that Romans 3:25 has Strong's 3688 whereas the TR does not. DM and David have been the primary curators of our KJV text. Any speculation on how an error

Re: [sword-devel] Suggestion for markup of Romans 3:26 in module KJV

Sorry, I made mistake in my previos email, Romans 3:25 would show that the word with Strong number 3688 is also τω. But according to https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G3688=KJV the word with strong number 3688 is ὄνος (donkey).

[sword-devel] Suggestion for markup of Romans 3:26 in module KJV

Good morning in the Lord For the module KJV the markup of Romans 3:26 is: morph="robinson:T-DSM robinson:N-DSM" src="12 14">time that says that word number 12 in Greek is τω with Strong number 3688 However Romans 3:25 shows that the word with Strong number 3688 is αιματι: