Documentation:http://wiki.crosswire.org/Alternate_VersificationThis and the source. For the nitty-gritty there is no way around other than reading the source. The versifications differ by books present, chapter and verse counts and are organised in tables within canon_xxx.h files in the include
On 31/05/2018 13:00, ref...@crosswire.org wrote:
> Dear All,
> This is to announce that we have just now uploaded OSHB.
> This is is an updated version of OSHB.
> Many thanks to David for the hard work.
>
Thanks a lot ! Amos's morphology are there !
Quick feedback on OSHB version 1.4
There are some duplicated items in oshb.conf
Obsoletes=OSMHB
Scope=Gen-Mal
Obsoletes=OSMHB
Obsoletes=OSMHB
Scope=Gen-Mal
And these lines are also dodgy as well as being duplicate keys!
LCSH=Bible.Hebrew.O.T..O.T.
LCSH=Bible. O.T. Hebrew..O.T..O.T.
​Best
The syntax is not different. The booknames are documented here:
https://wiki.crosswire.org/OSIS_Book_Abbreviations
However, some editions of the DC books make use of alphanumeric verse
designations for parts of the Greek additions from the LXX.
This makes things rather complicated even in
Dear All,
This is to announce that we have just now uploaded OSHB.
This is is an updated version of OSHB.
Many thanks to David for the hard work.
yours
The Module Team
P.S.: This email is sent automatically on upload of a new/updated module
___
In respect of John's recent threads on correct encoding of various apocryphal
texts, I had a look again at our support for GenBook bibles. The wiki lists
this as in development, but whatever development has happened in last few
years, it has not impacted onto GenBook bibles.
So my questions
Peter, David, et al,
Ok, I found the canon_*.h files in https://www.crosswire.org/svn/sword/trunk/include/
This is somewhat helpful. But it does not answer my questions.
(Btw the part about mapping the milestones and references to KJV is not really a big deal, because I already had the
Being somewhat new to the Sword project, and a module developer, not in Sword development per se, I don't have any particular
interest in GenBook bibles. It sound's like a kludgy way to avoid having to make the base engine powerful enough to handle
flexible versification.
I have been a
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:38 PM, John Dudeck wrote:
> Being somewhat new to the Sword project, and a module developer, not in
> Sword development per se, I don't have any particular interest in GenBook
> bibles. It sound's like a kludgy way to avoid having to make the base
> engine powerful
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 4:56 AM, ref...@gmx.net wrote:
> In respect of John's recent threads on correct encoding of various
> apocryphal texts, I had a look again at our support for GenBook bibles. The
> wiki lists this as in development, but whatever development has happened in
> last few
10 matches
Mail list logo
