I observe that the FILE osisCore.2.1.1.xsd references the namespace URL
'xmlns="http://www.bibletechnologies.net/2003/OSIS/namespace;' which seems
to NO longer exist.
Anyone know what's happening with the osisCore project and whether or not
any updates can be expected in the (near or otherwise
I'm currently using the command:
/usr/bin/osis2mod . /sword/dss/DSS.osis.xml -z -b 4 -v KJVA
Yet all I'm getting are the following errors:
Error reading ulCompOffset
Error reading ulCompOffset
Error reading ulCompOffset
...
I've created sword modules before, yet I don't recognize this error.
I
his? Copy this signature into your email program
> > and use the Internet to spread the Great News every time you email.
> >
> > On 02/19/2018 11:17 AM, DM Smith wrote:
> >> Recommend breaking your input into files by book. Run the Osis2mod for
> Genesis as before but the
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Error reading ulCompOffset
> From: "Andrew T."
> To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum
> CC:
>
>
> Peter, I asked a question about an error message. Your response deflected
> to me.
> Were you saying that the built module is missing expected content?
>
> DM
>
> > On Feb 17, 2018, at 11:14 PM, Andrew T. <thules...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm currently using the command:
> > /usr/bin/osis2mod . /sword/dss/DSS.osis.xml -z -b 4 -v KJVA
>
[sword-devel] Error reading ulCompOffset
> From: "Andrew T."
> To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum
> CC:
>
>
> Peter - thanks for the opportunity but I'm not going to re-open old
> controversies.
>
> ~A
>
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 3:23 PM, ref...@gmx.ne
ber what it was the last time, and with the
> nature of your modules I have little desire to think further.
>
> Sent from my mobile. Please forgive shortness, typos and weird
> autocorrects.
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Error read
e of your modules I have little desire to think further.
>>
>> Sent from my mobile. Please forgive shortness, typos and weird
>> autocorrects.
>>
>>
>> Original Message
>> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Error reading ulCompOffset
>> From: "Andrew T
attitude since we saw you last time here?
>
> Peter
>
> Sent from my mobile. Please forgive shortness, typos and weird
> autocorrects.
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: [sword-devel] Error reading ulCompOffset
> From: "Andrew T."
> To: S
ring his modules up for "testing".
>
>
> Sent from my mobile. Please forgive shortness, typos and weird
> autocorrects.
>
>
> ---- Original Message
> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Virtual modules (parallelism) & fragmentary
> texts
> From: "A
This is very helpful Peter. Thank you.
However, I’d like to ask about enforcement.
Does a module actually need to be submitted to the project to be judged?
Or is it sufficient to judge modules the project has never seen by simply
judging the reputation of the person working on them?
What is the
so long as there is transparency in these discussions, respect,
due consideration and no bullying, of course Ill live within the standards
of the community.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 9:06 AM Andrew T. wrote:
> Please, be patient and civil in this discussion, appreciating that
> copyrigh
ry single technical enquiry sent by
> you was coupled with just this, you are asked to refrain from that too.
>
>
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 10. September 2018 um 14:05 Uhr
> *Von:* "Andrew T."
> *An:* "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum"
> *Betreff:* Re: [s
subscribed to the
> Berne convention, but it introduced copyright in 1987. Everything before is
> under public domain. Can I publish this Bible in my language, it was
> published in 1985.?" Ah, this is an interesting one...
>
>
> This is the process, if you want to call it so. Played
Please, be patient and civil in this discussion, appreciating that
copyright and biblical texts are both important and that controversy
abounds when discussing both. Everyone's perspective is welcomed here:
___
sword-devel mailing list:
Peter, there's agreement here. Lets not ruin it ok?
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:32 AM Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 15:35 +0200, Peter Von Kaehne wrote:
> > This matter has been discussed ad nauseam on our mailing list several
> > years ago. Nothing has changed since.
>
>
e cease debating the matter here and please
> cease offering "test modules" on our list.
>
>
>
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 10. September 2018 um 14:15 Uhr
> *Von:* "Andrew T."
> *An:* "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum"
> *Betreff:* Re: [sword-
I agree with Peter. The original work and the derivative work are separate
cases.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:42 AM Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 09:54 -0400, Tom Sullivan wrote:
> > First, take Matthew Henry's or Calvin's commentaries. They are way
> > out
> > of copyright to
Tom, PD is 'public domain'. Public Domain (PD) refers materials that are
not or no longer protected by intellectual property laws such as copyright,
trademark etc.
To confuse, different jurisdictions have different criteria for materials
to enter into the Public Domain. For example see the
modules (parallelism) & fragmentary texts
> From: "Andrew T."
> To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum
> CC:
>
>
> The wiki’s whiteboard shows discussion about support for virtual modules:
> https://wiki.crosswire.org/Whiteboard/Virtual_Modules
>
> Sp
The wiki’s whiteboard shows discussion about support for virtual modules:
https://wiki.crosswire.org/Whiteboard/Virtual_Modules
Specifically the idea of pushing parallelism back to the API has
potentially great benefit for modules built from incomplete MSS. For
example, I’ve compared the English
Is this just a matter of creating the canon_xxx.h files or is there more to
it? I've been playing around with alternate versifications (creating
canon_xxx.h files and them modifying versificationmgr.cpp to support). But
I'm not a professional programmer even if I dabble ..
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018
In general I've found the osisCore.2.1.1.xsd file to be incompatible with
claims made in the OSIS 2.1 User Manual:
https://www.crosswire.org/osis/OSIS%202.1.1%20User%20Manual%2006March2006.pdf
It was something of an epiphany to find that people had been making
incremental improvements to the
23 matches
Mail list logo
