On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Sid Ferreira wrote:
> Well Jon, your answers helped a lot to make me more confortable with
> using sf 1.4 for now.
> Indeed, I already started the works, and I believe I'm doing in a way
> that will be easy to upgrade (aka: lot's of classes).
>
> About the 2.0's:
Well Jon, your answers helped a lot to make me more confortable with
using sf 1.4 for now.
Indeed, I already started the works, and I believe I'm doing in a way
that will be easy to upgrade (aka: lot's of classes).
About the 2.0's: Will we have the forms? And the routes?
Thanks in advance once
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Sid Ferreira wrote:
> Hi Jon!
> Well, I know and understand. But at same time, Im thinking why would I
> build something, that will be stable only to the end of the year, that
> has no comercial use, with something that has a deprecation date
> already.
> Als
Hi Jon!
Well, I know and understand. But at same time, Im thinking why would I
build something, that will be stable only to the end of the year, that
has no comercial use, with something that has a deprecation date
already.
Also I was thinking about have project 'building' scripts, so would be
like
