Updates:
Labels: PassedReview
Comment #2 on issue 3411 by skirpic...@gmail.com: Asymptotic expansion of
Fresnel integrals
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3411
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2905
--
You received this message because this project is configured to
I wish to submit my pull request on computing the degree of polynomials. I
am currently working on it . Is there any deadlines I should be aware of?
On 16 February 2014 10:01, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
I've started work on SymPy 0.7.5. This release is mostly to ensure
that the
Hello,
here is an update for our issues migration task...
1) A tool (works with pyquery-1.2.4, everything else - from the Debian
Wheezy)
https://github.com/skirpichev/google-code-issues-migrator/blob/my2/exportissues.py
to do export in the suggested format.
2) authors.json - database
I am waiting for this PR to be reviewed before the next version, it
corrects some bugs:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2805
On Sunday, February 16, 2014 5:31:16 AM UTC+1, Aaron Meurer wrote:
I've started work on SymPy 0.7.5. This release is mostly to ensure
that the PyDy folks have a
Hi ,
I am Havish Chennamaraj , a second year under-graduate from
Internation Institute of Information Technology - Hyderabad and I would
like to be an applicant to SymPy for GSoC 2014 .I am a mathematics and
computer science enthusiast and have decent coding and technical knowledge
in
Aaron,
I just ran the tutorials from SymPy master and everything is looking really
good!
Here are the tutorial notebooks:
https://github.com/pydy/pydy-tutorial-pycon-2014
So, we are ready to go in terms of the SymPy release. No foreseeable
additions are needed from my side.
Thanks for all of
Hello All!
I am pleased to announce that *SciPy 2014*, the thirteenth annual *Scientific
Computing with Python conference*, will be held this July 6th-12th in
Austin, Texas. SciPy is a community dedicated to the advancement of
scientific computing through open source Python software for
Hi Rajat,
How are you doing this? Can you post the source code somewhere? If you
use github then that is best.
-Matthew
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:29 AM, RAJAT AGGARWAL rajataggarwal1...@gmail.com
wrote:
More examples attached. Have a look at it and please provide me the
feedback. As i
Hi Matheww
You can look at the following link. I had just posted some methods of the
classes so that you can have the idea of some modifications.
https://github.com/rajat974/StepDerivation
Rajat Aggarwal
On Sunday, February 16, 2014 3:04:19 AM UTC+5:30, RAJAT AGGARWAL wrote:
Based on
Hi,
I am Aditya Shah and I am a third year Computer SCience student at
BITS-Pilani university. I would like to work with Sympy for GSOC. I had
previously posted on this mailing list regarding my willingness to
implement the group theory module for Sympy. While scrolling through the
ideas list,
Thanks a ton for doing this Sergey.
I should add that you're going to help review issue quality, don't
need to care about about closed issues. Closed issue discussions are
not used very often, and we do plan to keep the google code site
around as read only.
Aaron Meurer
On Feb 16, 2014, at
Folks, new features are not slated for this release. The release branch is
already made, and I intended to make a release candidate today. Don't
worry. We can do another release literally any time. Just let me know if
you want one.
F.B., how important is your bug fix branch? Are there API
Thanks a ton for doing this Sergey.
+1
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks a ton for doing this Sergey.
I should add that you're going to help review issue quality, don't
need to care about about closed issues. Closed issue discussions are
not
On Sunday, February 16, 2014 6:21:50 PM UTC+1, Aaron Meurer wrote:
F.B., how important is your bug fix branch? Are there API changes?
No, the API is almost still the same. Just some minor useless methods
removed.
By the way, it's not urgent. Primarily, the metric tensor in the master
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:17:18AM -0600, Aaron Meurer wrote:
I should add that you're going to help review issue quality, don't
need to care about about closed issues. Closed issue discussions are
not used very often, and we do plan to keep the google code site
around as read only.
Yes, they
I already see some issues with the pull request, so I am not going to
merge it for this release.
And by the way, you should not assume that just because no one on the
mailing list has discussed it that no one is using the code. In fact,
I seem to remember that you have pointed several people to
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Sergey B Kirpichev
skirpic...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:17:18AM -0600, Aaron Meurer wrote:
I should add that you're going to help review issue quality, don't
need to care about about closed issues. Closed issue discussions are
not used very
All the current code in in SymPy, in sympy/parsing. You should think
about how to structure the parsing module, so that it is extensible
enough to handle many different kinds of inputs (LaTeX, mathematica,
natural language, etc.).
Aaron Meurer
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Aditya Shah
Hello,
Can some one brief me about the conflicts caused by the creation of this
module? (Sachin mentioned it).
It'll give me a head start in contributing to this module.
Thank you.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Alan Bromborsky abro...@verizon.netwrote:
Please note that the geometric
Electrodynamics can be computed with traditional vector calculus or as Alan
shows with newer generalized methods of geometric algebra. Prasoon's work
last year was to develop a general vector calculus package and a then to
make use of this core for the existing mechanics package and the new
Hello Jason,
Thanks for your inputs.
I'm looking into both prasoon's work and the geometric algebra module.
I believe use of geometric algebra is better as it is more general. But, to
keep it simple, use of conventionally used 3D co-ordinate systems must be
made easier.
What I mean to say is, a
21 matches
Mail list logo
