Re: [sympy] Re: [GSoC 2014] Cylindrical algebraic decomposition - Introduction

2014-02-28 Thread someone
Hi, That's a great reference. Can you put that on the ideas page, if it isn't there already? I'll add more stuff there. Sorry if I delay this again and again but it's quite a busy time right now. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy group. To

Re: [sympy] Re: New PEP for infix operator

2014-02-28 Thread Joachim Durchholz
Am 27.02.2014 13:59, schrieb Sergey Kirpichev: btw, here is a discussion of the possibility to have generic infix ops (the whole thread): https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-July/081509.html I have finally gotten around to read the thread. It's a waste to time to read that.

Re: [sympy] New PEP for infix operator

2014-02-28 Thread Joachim Durchholz
Am 25.02.2014 17:31, schrieb Aaron Meurer: Some people on this list might be interested in this. Some folks are giving another shot at writing a PEP to add a new operator to Python for matrix multiplication. The discussion is at https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/4351. I think it's irrelevant

[sympy] Improvement in Group Theory Module

2014-02-28 Thread Vishnu Agarwal
Hi, I am a student of Third year in IIT Roorkee currently pursuing Integrated MSc. in Applied Mathematics.I want to submit my project proposal on your one of listed ideaGroup theory Module as a part of Google Summer of Code 2014. *My inputs for this idea are:-* Finite groups can be

Re: [sympy] Re: GSOC 2014 idea: Adding parsing functionality to Sympy Live

2014-02-28 Thread Aditya Shah
@asmeurer @skirpichev So how do you feel about the above mentioned idea? A generic parsing framework for Sympy to facilitate extending Sympy to similar Math Spec Languages? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy group. To unsubscribe from this group

[sympy] Re: Discussion regarding the series expansion project

2014-02-28 Thread Sergey Kirpichev
On Friday, February 28, 2014 12:01:10 AM UTC+4, Avichal Dayal wrote: Yes, that's very *big* amount of work. You mean enough for the summer or too much for the summer? It depends on what is exactly you are planning to do. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[sympy] Re: Improvement in Group Theory Module

2014-02-28 Thread Vishnu Agarwal
@ProspectiveMentor: Please reply to this post so that I can further discuss it.. On Friday, February 28, 2014 1:44:05 PM UTC+5:30, Vishnu Agarwal wrote: Hi, I am a student of Third year in IIT Roorkee currently pursuing Integrated MSc. in Applied Mathematics.I want to submit my

[sympy] Re: asymptotic expansion of sin and cos at infinity

2014-02-28 Thread Avichal Dayal
Currently the series method does not allow to return only the Order term. That is because by default n=6, and since it does not get enough terms it throws an error. So, how would it detect that series obtained is the actual one and not an error (since less terms are calculated)? -- You

[sympy] Re: Electrodynamics in Physics Module

2014-02-28 Thread Sachin Joglekar
Hello again. Jason and I had a talk about this a few days back, and we agreed that it would be better if, according to your original plan, your proposal would focus on- 1) Improving the sympy.physics.vector module with the functionalities you plan to implement 2) Building up an E-M module Step

Re: [sympy] Re: Electrodynamics in Physics Module

2014-02-28 Thread Rajath Shashidhara
Hello Sachin, I have my mid-semester exams going on. Right now, I have very limited time to spend on this. I'll definitely get back to you after my exams. I look forward to work with you. Thanks. On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Sachin Joglekar srjoglekar...@gmail.comwrote: Hello again.

[sympy] Re: Risch algorithm for Symbolic Integration -GSOC Idea

2014-02-28 Thread Anurag Sharma
Hi Aaron I guess I got it from Bronstein's book. I agree that the pseudo code in there really helps. But I was trying to find some other sources of introducing the algorithm without really going into the maths involved. For last two days I have been sitting with a senior of mine and reading the

Re: [sympy] Community input on chat

2014-02-28 Thread Vinzent Steinberg
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 5:21:52 PM UTC-5, Ondřej Čertík wrote: +1 to gitter. I am not on IRC anymore, since it's really inconvenient, given that I frequently switch several computers. Gitter works perfectly for me. I really wished they fixed account permission issue together with

[sympy] Implementation of second order ODEs

2014-02-28 Thread kundan . kumar . eee11
Hi Everyone, I am a B.tech student in Electrical Engineering at IIT-BHU, Varanasi, India. I found few interesting ideas in SymPy Gsoc 2014 page in which implementation of second order ODEs caught my attention. As first order ODEs is already implemented in gsoc 2013, I am going to implement

[sympy] Guidance with Multivariate polynomials and factorization

2014-02-28 Thread Saienthan K
Hi, I am Saienthan K and I am a Computer Science in PES University, India. I would like to work with Sympy for GSOC 2014 on improving the multivariate polynomial arithmetic. To begin with the idea I have read the papers on The Geobucket Data Structure for Polynomials-Thomas Yan and

[sympy] [GSOC-2014]- CSymPy implementation of elementary functions-Introduction

2014-02-28 Thread kunal arora
Hello , my name is Kunal Arora. I am a 2nd year engineering(IT) undergraduate from NSIT,Delhi(India). I am proficient in c/c++ and have been programming in c/c++ for quite a while now . Although i haven't been involved in any particular real world/open-source projects involving c/c++ but i

Re: [sympy] Re: Risch algorithm for Symbolic Integration -GSOC Idea

2014-02-28 Thread Aaron Meurer
IRC has been silent for a while. That's why I'm trying to get people to move to Gitter. I would much rather you use it. And once they have a mobile application, I will get pinged on things even when I am not at my computer. Aaron Meurer On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Anurag Sharma

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC Theano/SymPy/PyDy

2014-02-28 Thread Frédéric Bastien
Hi, The current problem that we have in implementing those 2 ideas is the time to do it. The time investment is a bit hard to justify for the people currently developing Theano because of the high likelihood that we will not really use those additional features for our research. I find those 2

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC Theano/SymPy/PyDy

2014-02-28 Thread Aaron Meurer
SymPy is not likely to accept a project under its umbrella unless it results in a lot of code for SymPy itself. I'm not saying that it's a specific rule that we have or anything, just that we tend to get a lot more students than slots, and so we have to prioritize things. Plus the PSF tends to

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC Theano/SymPy/PyDy

2014-02-28 Thread Ondřej Čertík
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: SymPy is not likely to accept a project under its umbrella unless it results in a lot of code for SymPy itself. I'm not saying that it's a specific rule that we have or anything, just that we tend to get a lot more

[sympy] Re: Risch algorithm for Symbolic Integration -GSOC Idea

2014-02-28 Thread Anurag Sharma
Hi Aaron and everyone Apart from from tying loose ends from previous year's GSOC, what more need to be implemented ? After a cursory glance over the code of cds.py and corresponding Ch-8 in Bronstein, I find all the pseudo codes implemented in cds.py. Aaron can you point me to some larger

Re: [sympy] Re: Risch algorithm for Symbolic Integration -GSOC Idea

2014-02-28 Thread Aaron Meurer
There's a lot of work, even just from Bronstein's book. All the three major subcases, exponential, logarithmic, and trigonometric, have algorithms that need to be implemented. Most of them are blocking on some core algorithms, which is where a lot of the work from last summer's project went.

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC Theano/SymPy/PyDy

2014-02-28 Thread Jason Moore
Frédéric, we can also add these ideas to the GSoC page on pydy.org. We've asked for some slots from the PSF also, so if we get a good proposal for that it could be a nice collabortive project between SymPy, PyDy, and Theano. I'd really like to see a nice ODE code generator as part of SymPy's code

Re: [sympy] GSoC Theano/SymPy/PyDy

2014-02-28 Thread Tim Lahey
For ODE Code Generation, I recommend looking at Allan Wittkopf's paper, Automatic Code Generation and Optimization in Maple. http://jnaiam.org/index.php?/archives/65-Automatic-Code-Generation-and-Optimization-in-Maple.html He did a lot of work on specifically generating C code for systems of

Re: [sympy] GSOC - Step-by-Step calculations

2014-02-28 Thread Matthew Rocklin
Hi Gabriel/bl0ckedusersoft, Your step-by-step derivative calculator looks neat and hopefully the experience will help you. I'm curious, why isn't the source code for the step-by-step feature released? From what I understand the approach you took on your project seems reasonable (safe to say,

Re: [sympy] GSoC Theano/SymPy/PyDy

2014-02-28 Thread Matthew Rocklin
David Ketcheson has an interesting project related to ODEs named nodepy. The introductory sentence follows *NodePy (Numerical ODEs in Python) is a Python package for designing, analyzing, and testing numerical methods for initial value ODEs. Its development was motivated by my own research in

Re: [sympy] GSOC - Step-by-Step calculations

2014-02-28 Thread bl0ckedusersoft
Hello Matthew The source code for my program is not released because it needs some better commenting and some cleaning-up -- I was trying to make the program into an ad-supported proprietary program, which didn't work out very well. I will probably eventually clean up and release the source,

[sympy] GSOC - Improving SymPyGamma

2014-02-28 Thread SAHIL SHEKHAWAT
I have been working with sympygamma from last 2-3 months and would like to improve it. But there are about three big issues which alone don't make up to a summer's work but together they will improve sympy-gamma to a great extent. *Plotting* is a main issue as D3.js which don't support 3-D

Re: [sympy] Re: Electrodynamics in Physics Module

2014-02-28 Thread Rajath Shashidhara
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Sachin Joglekar srjoglekar...@gmail.comwrote: Hello again. Jason and I had a talk about this a few days back, and we agreed that it would be better if, according to your original plan, your proposal would focus on- 1) Improving the sympy.physics.vector