Hi!
I'd like to solve the following system of trigonometric equation:
(R+r)*cos(gamma1) + r*cos(k*gamma1+alpha_0) == (R+r)*cos(gamma2) + r*cos(k*
gamma2+alpha_1)
(R+r)*cos(gamma1) + r*cos(k*gamma1+alpha_0) == (R+r)*cos(gamma2) + r*cos(k*
gamma2+alpha_1)
where:
gamma1, gamma2 = var('gamma1,
On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 7:45:11 PM UTC+5:30, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
Hi Praktik,
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Pratik Patel
pratikpa...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
Hi,
Sometimes ago i made one post(Introduction) and it is not displayed in
the
group.
I can see your
Wasn't there an implementation in Maple? Is it online?
Aaron Meurer
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 11:27 AM, someone someb...@bluewin.ch wrote:
Hi,
I want to implement Karr Algorithm for GSoC 2015. I have read the
Karr's original paper
This is just for Background and basic definition.
It is not
I am kind of stuck in my proposal. For solving 2nd order DE's I need their
symmetries. In every source on the ideas page as well as other papers I
read much is written about solving the ODE after the symmetries have been
extracted. I am not able to find a concise algorithm which helps me in
Hi,
I want to implement Karr Algorithm for GSoC 2015. I have read the
Karr's original paper
This is just for Background and basic definition.
It is not complete enough for a modern implementation.
and Brucin Erocal's thesis
http://www.sagemath.org/files/thesis/erocal-thesis-2011.pdf
He
Go through
this https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/introduction-to-contributing If
you have any questions feel free to ask here or on gitter.
On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 1:29:06 PM UTC+5:30, Pratik Patel wrote:
Hello,
My name is Pratik Patel. I'm from India. I am 2nd year Computer
Hi,
I saw that the solving of linear systems is also a Mess in
the current solve, There is lot of duplication of Methods/Algorithms
in the current code, as mentioned by Aaron in this PR.
Ref: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2580
We need to have a General linear solve for solving system
Am 06.03.2015 um 23:12 schrieb Aaron Meurer:
So one of your suggestions is probably the best fix. Your suggestion 2
(or 3, I don't see the difference) sounds like the best plan to me.
The plan was to have 2: Set up S.Whatever but delay instance creation,
and 3: delay S.Whatever creation.
A suggestion is to show a fake session where you show what the
module will do (like a doctest for the final function showing inputs
and outputs). This shows that you at least are thinking about the API,
and that you understand the problem.
For something as complicated as CAD, I would also make
That is huge list of ideas probably you should narrow down on them a little
bit . I am not associated with nay of them. I can give some general advice.
First setup your environment and satisfy the patch requirement for GSoC.
This help you get hang of things. Pick an easy to fix issue in the
Hi,
I was thinking, How about designing the solveset similiar
to the ODE Module . Something like hints system to classify solvers?
Example:
primaryhint = [
univariate,
multivariate,
single_eq,
multiple_eq
]
subhints = [
'solve_linear_system'
'linear_trig',
11 matches
Mail list logo
