You can get the tuple of factors of your expression:
In [9]: t.args
Out[9]: (4, metric(i4, i5), p(L_0), q(-L_0))
Slice away the terms you don't want, and multiply by something else:
In [20]: prod(t.args[:2]) * other
Out[20]: (4*other)*metric(i4, i5)
On Wednesday, 9 March 2016 21:24:38
>
> I think that issuse https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/10680 has been
> resolved , sir Aaron Meurer Can you check my pull Request .
>
Thanks in advance.
cheers
Abhishek Verma
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To
Thank you Aaron!
Thanks everybody for contributing to SymPy. I just counted it, there
were 479 people who contributed code up until the version 1.0.
It's been an honor to work with you all.
Ondrej
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> I'm proud the announce
Jason,
I am stuck with my work. Can you please help me to gear up? As my project
deals with Symengine, I need to start working on that. As mentioned in the
ideas page,
*This project would be dedicated to ensuring SymEngine worked with all
operations typically used in the sympy.physics.vector
Although I haven't worked in Sympy for a while, I was eagerly waiting for
1.0. Congratulations everyone! :)
Saurabh Jha
On Mar 10, 2016 9:03 AM, "AMiT Kumar" wrote:
> That's a great news. Kudos SymPy Development Team!
>
>
> Amit Kumar
>
> On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at
Kudos to SymPy development team. :)
On Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:32:33 UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> I'm proud the announce that SymPy version 1.0 has been released. To
> install this release use
>
> pip install -U sympy
>
> or if you use Anaconda, use
>
> conda install sympy
>
Hi Sahil,
You are free to chose any project that you find interesting. This document
will help you get started with SymPy:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Introduction-to-contributing
You can also have a look at GSoC 2016 Student Instructions to get to know
what's expected from the
That's a great news. Kudos SymPy Development Team!
Amit Kumar
On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 1:32:33 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> I'm proud the announce that SymPy version 1.0 has been released. To
> install this release use
>
> pip install -U sympy
>
> or if you use Anaconda,
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Jason Moore wrote:
> I think that creating a formula input widget for Jupyter would be a solid
> project to work on for GSoC. That would open up a lot of possibilities.
Indeed. In general, any improvements like these I would be very happy
to
I think that creating a formula input widget for Jupyter would be a solid
project to work on for GSoC. That would open up a lot of possibilities.
Jason
moorepants.info
+01 530-601-9791
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Francesco Bonazzi
wrote:
> Jupyter notebooks use
Thanks Aaron and all the contributors! It's great to move to 1.0!
Jason
moorepants.info
+01 530-601-9791
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Rathmann wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 12:02:33 PM UTC-8, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>>
>> I'm proud the
Jupyter notebooks use MathJax to display LaTeX formulae. MathJax is a
Javascript library that renders LaTeX code into HTML.
I would be nice to have the MathJax HTML generation in order to add HTML
events to the displayed formula.
If you succeed to do it, you could also create an IPython widget
Hello,
I am Sahil Aggarwal, Sophomore IIT Delhi, Mathematics and Computing.
I am new to the open source community. I wish to write a proposal for gsoc
2016. I went through the Ideas list of SymPy and would love to work in
"Group Theory". Being a mathematics graduate student, I have a decent
I'm proud the announce that SymPy version 1.0 has been released. To
install this release use
pip install -U sympy
or if you use Anaconda, use
conda install sympy
(the conda version may take a day or two to be available).
There are many major changes in this release. The full release
Hi Jason,
I tried "%matplotlib notebook" and it gives me interactive plots within the
notebook!!
I have been trying to do it.
Thankyou very much!
On Wednesday, 9 March 2016 21:40:20 UTC+5:30, Jason Moore wrote:
>
> Note that you can simply type "%matplotlib notebook" if you want
>
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Sartaj Singh wrote:
>> I ran the notebook. No window appears for me
> .
> I also ran the notebook, the plot window appears for me though. The plots
> are interactive :).
>
>> My idea is to make this work inside the browser itself, so that
> What would be the best place to do a bug report ? Github ?
Yes, we have our bug tracker on github. File an issue [here](
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues).
On 9 March 2016 at 23:46, Vincent Noel wrote:
> Many thanks Aaron !
>
> What would be the best place
Many thanks Aaron !
What would be the best place to do a bug report ? Github ?
Vincent
On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 6:48:46 PM UTC-3, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> I think the evaluation of booleans happens in the superclass
> (LatticeOp), which ignores the evaluate flag. It should probably be
>
Thanks Harsh and aaron for your reply , this will help a lot.
>
>
> One of the issue I feel is, how do determine the
> points between which you are talking the difference? Also can you
> provide a link to the original Quora discussion.
The original answer is mostly taken from here :
On Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:57:14 UTC+1, Tanu Hari Dixit wrote:
>
>
> 2)The optimizer can implement the following with individual switches:
>
>
> i)unrolled pow(x, n)
>
> ii)fused add multiply for floating point calculations
>
> iii)intelligent guess about whether to use exp2
>
i, ii) any
Note that you can simply type "%matplotlib notebook" if you want
interactive plots from matplotlib in the notebook.
Bokeh and mpld3 also give this functionality.
Jason
moorepants.info
+01 530-601-9791
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Sartaj Singh
wrote:
> > I ran the
> I ran the notebook. No window appears for me
.
I also ran the notebook, the plot window appears for me though. The plots
are interactive :).
> My idea is to make this work inside the browser itself, so that it works
for everybody (and myself too).
I agree with ondrej that it is better to be
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 3:15 AM, Aman Deep wrote:
> Hello Developers,
>
> As you all suggested, I have started working on Jupyter as the Gui with
> sympy.
>
> As Ondrej suggested to make some interactive plots using sympy in Jupyter
> notebook since the current plots are
Thank you, Jason and Aaron for the elaborate reply.
I am now a bit clear as to what has to be done if one takes this up.
I also understood why you have considered AST as a better option than
templating.
Also, this is what I construed:
1)An optimization pipeline has to be formulated.
I have
Hello Developers,
As you all suggested, I have started working on Jupyter as the Gui with
sympy.
As Ondrej suggested to make some interactive plots using sympy in Jupyter
notebook since the current plots are static.
So After going through some online resources , I was able to make some
25 matches
Mail list logo