Re: [sympy] Dataclasses for symbolic computation

Data classes are a nice syntactic convenience, and it's useful to have them if you are using something like that so you don't have to rewrite all the boilerplate. But I've never really found the "objects representing a tree of expressions" as being the hard part of symbolic computation. A

[sympy] Re: Gsoc' 23

Hello Everyone, I am Mihir Kumar Singh, and Physics undergrad from India. I have a good understanding of Physics and programming (C++, Python and JS). I am excied to see the project ideas of GSOC-22 and would like to contribute to any of the following ideas: - Classical Mechanics: Efficient

[sympy] Gsoc' 23

Greetings Everyone, I am currently pursuing my Undergraduate and am interested to contribute to SymPy for the gsoc23. Where can I start? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

[sympy] Dataclasses for symbolic computation

After Python 3.6 dataclasses were introduced. Usually, the basic objects of symbolic computation (term) is based on syntactic equality between the objects, which has isomorphism or homomorphism (if there is eager evaluation) from term algebra , which