Re: [sympy] Regarding Solver

Hi Mugdha Joshi, Its very good to know that you are interested in solvers and you know what is pending. I am not able to understand how you will be going to apply Newton Raphson method for Trigonometric equations and what will be its pros and cons. And for rest I will suggest to keep contributing

Re: [sympy] Introduction to Sympy Community

) for stalled PRs. Feel free to open a new one for continuing one of these. Cheers! Jogi Miglani | Undergraduate Mathematics And Computing Indian Institute Of Technology (BHU), Varanasi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubs

Re: [sympy] Re: MatPow bug or inconsistency?

I might had done work on this in #15712 . But in that case i considered the cases where the determinent of Matrix was zero. Although something can be changed here

[sympy] Re: xscale='log' seems to be broken in v.1.4

Hi Javier, Sorry for inconvenience caused to you. I got that the limits are not being showed properly after reproducing the error in my laptop. I will solve this bug as soon as possible or open an issue regarding this and get it merged to master. Cheers Jogi Miglani On Thursday, May 9, 2019

Re: [sympy] EmptySet() after sympify - nonlinsolve combo

correct syntax). Jogi Miglani On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 7:28 PM Michele Strada wrote: > Hello, > I'm trying to create a system solver for my project. > I created a string-list in order to save my expressions: > > system = ["exp1", "exp2"] > > afte

Re: [sympy] Re: [DISCUSSION] Solvers

I have shared draft of my proposal with Sympy. Its in PDF format . Mentors please check it out and let me know about your suggestions - https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2019-Current-Applications On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:01 PM Jogi Miglani wrote: > I had also tried a different appro

Re: [sympy] Re: [DISCUSSION] Solvers

I had also tried a different approach i.e more general for handling modular equations locally. That was facing some issue. I will also be making a PR to get more of your suggestions. More tests I will be adding to it. On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 6:17 PM Yathartha Joshi wrote: > Yeah, you can but if

Re: [sympy] Re: [DISCUSSION] Solvers

went through most of the issues and PRs. Many of them are related to the project. I think it can be covered side by side as my work proceeds. I will be updating you about my work. Sincerely, Jogi Miglani On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 7:15 PM Nabanita Dash wrote: > I also wanted to work on solvers,

[sympy] [DISCUSSION] Solvers

Hello, As we know that the work for solvers i.e replacing solve with solveset is being in progress from last four years. A lot of work has been done during this period by Harsh Gupta(@hargup), Amit Kumar(@aktech), Kshitij Saraogi(@kshitij10496), Shekhar Rajak(@Shekharrajak) and Yathartha

[sympy] Guidance on implementing the non-linear multivariate system in the solveset

Hello Everyone I went through the solvers project in the ideas list of GSOC 18. Enhancing capabilities of solveset seems interesting to me. I went through the task list in #10006 in which the following tasks are unmarked and the completed work in Gsoc 2018 by @Yathartha22 * Non-linear

[sympy] Introduction

Hello everyone, I am Jogi Miglani, sophomore undergraduate pursuing Mathematics and Computing at IIT(BHU). I have developed interest towards probability and quantitative finance over last three semesters. I have background knowledge in differential equations, Linear Algebra