Thanks for your feedback. I will submit the proposal soon.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020, 3:21 AM Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
> I had a quick look and it seems reasonable.
>
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Milan Jolly wrote:
> >
> > If there are no issues with the proposal or the timelin
mpy's
>> capabilities for systems of ODEs would be expanded enormously.
>>
>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 at 19:26, Milan Jolly wrote:
>> >
>> > Here is the link to my proposal:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/12QN19LSjwEvYoSukyq-BWd76ZrI24FQuU0CGIOIx6Ww/edit?u
I took a quick look. I found the logic of ode2sys and ode_rewrite very
resourceful since its required for component division and for reducing
higher order ODEs.
On Wednesday, March 25, 2020 at 2:28:10 AM UTC+5:30, Nicolas Guarin wrote:
>
> You can check what I have done about it in the
ously.
>
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 at 19:26, Milan Jolly > wrote:
> >
> > Here is the link to my proposal:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/12QN19LSjwEvYoSukyq-BWd76ZrI24FQuU0CGIOIx6Ww/edit?usp=sharing
>
> >
> > On Saturday, March 21, 2020 at 3:22:00 A
ufficient.
>
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 16:57, Milan Jolly > wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for clearing my doubt.
> >
> > Now, I have started preparing my GSOC proposal and it will be ready
> soon. But, I wanted to know that will it be ok that I don't give details
> a
rts do in high-level terms should
> be sufficient.
>
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 16:57, Milan Jolly wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for clearing my doubt.
> >
> > Now, I have started preparing my GSOC proposal and it will be ready
> soon. But, I wanted to know that will it
ff(t)`...
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 18:34, Milan Jolly > wrote:
> >
> > In ODE systems roadmap, you have mentioned that for system of ODEs where
> the coefficient matrix is non-constant, if the coefficient matrix A(t) is
> symmetric, then A(t) and its anti
not
> yet handled by the new code.
>
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 17:51, Milan Jolly > wrote:
> >
> > So, I have made a rough layout of the main function that will be used to
> solve ODEs with the methods like
> neq_nth_order_
t)⎬, ⎨──(x(t)): -y(t), ──(y(t)):
> x(t)⎬, ⎨──(x(t)): y(t), ──(y(t)): -x(t)⎬, ⎨──(x(t)): y(t), ──(y(t)):
> x(t)⎬⎥
> ⎣⎩dt dt ⎭ ⎩dt dt⎭
> ⎩dt dt ⎭ ⎩dt dt⎭⎦
>
> On Mon, 16 Mar
rtant than implementing all
> of the pieces. If the groundwork is done then other contributors in
> future can easily implement the remaining features one by one. Right
> now it is not easy to improve the code for systems because of the way
> that it is structured.
>
> On Su
nywhere as far as I know. Following the roadmap it should be possible
> to close all of these issues I think:
>
> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Asolvers.dsolve.system
>
>
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 at 22:30, Milan Jolly > wrote:
>
unaware how much time each part of the
general solvers would take.
If someone can help me in this regard(helping me with these 2 questions)
then it would be great.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020, 5:09 AM Milan Jolly wrote:
> I will go through the roadmap. Also, I will work on reviving and finish
PRs
> and finish them off.
>
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 05:59, Milan Jolly wrote:
> >
> > So, I am interested in rewriting parts of the current ODE as discussed
> in the roadmap. Is there any work started in that direction and if not then
> can I create a PR for the s
here is no need
> to "refactor" it in its current form if it is in fact being
> *completely* rewritten: we can just make sure that the new code is
> written the way we want it to be.
>
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 at 19:52, Milan Jolly wrote:
> >
> > Ok so I have gone through t
in calculus module. I have been
working on the issue https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/18550 and I think
there is some scope to extend these functionalities.
On Sunday, February 23, 2020 at 1:32:20 AM UTC+5:30, Milan Jolly wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> My name is Milan Jo
using its strongly connected components
> > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/16174. However, this is the sort
> > of thing that could get very messy the way the code is currently
> > rewritten, which is why a refactor is so important.
> >
> > Aaron Meurer
> >
>
Hello everyone,
My name is Milan Jolly and I am an undergraduate student at Indian
Institute of Technology, Patna. For the past 2 month, I have been learning
and exploring sympy through either contributions, reading documentation or
trying examples out. This last month I have learned a lot
17 matches
Mail list logo
