[sympy] Re: Google Season of Docs 2021

Hii Aaron. I was contributing for 1 month to apply in google season of docs last year before its start, but in the end, I get to know that the guys who already have experience in technical writing can only apply. Is this rule still there, or are there some modifications in it? Thank you. On

[sympy] Re: Google Season of Docs 2021

Hii Aaron. I was contributing for 1 month to apply in google season of docs, but in the end, I get to know that the guys who already have experience in technical writing can only use it. Is this rule still there, or are there some modifications in it? Thank you. On Wednesday, February 10, 2021

Re: [sympy] doubt related to GSoD

Thanks for reply, Actually I don't have any technical writing background. All I have is knowledge in python. I too want to apply, but when I saw that it is necessary to have some experience in it, I became confused whether I can apply or not. What if simeone wants to pursue carrier as technical

[sympy] doubt related to GSoD

Hello everyone, As we all know that GSoD student application period has been started from today. I want to know that can I apply for it even if I have not previously done any technical writer job? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To

[sympy] Re: Travis ci build failed

Hii there, I figured out what wrong I was doing. I was providing unnecessary indentation in docstring. On Tuesday, June 9, 2020 at 4:06:53 AM UTC+5:30, Mohit Shah wrote: > > Link for the above problem is here (Link > <https://travis-ci.org/github/sympy/sympy/jobs/696219361>) >

[sympy] Re: Travis ci build failed

Link for the above problem is here (Link <https://travis-ci.org/github/sympy/sympy/jobs/696219361>) On Tuesday, June 9, 2020 at 3:36:02 AM UTC+5:30, Mohit Shah wrote: > > Actually I was facing one more error before this one. > It is as below: > > [image: githuberror2.PNG] &g

[sympy] Re: Travis ci build failed

Thanks for the help. On Tuesday, June 9, 2020 at 1:50:48 AM UTC+5:30, Jonathan Gutow wrote: > > The line near the end explaining the Assertion error explains it. You have > some extra whitespace. > > On Monday, June 8, 2020 at 3:17:44 PM UTC-5, Mohit Shah wrote: >> >&g

Re: [sympy] Sympy Document

style guide. Although, we should add > those sections to the style guide then. > > It can be like you showed or it can be: > > name : type > Description > > Regards, > Nikhil Maan > > On Saturday, June 6, 2020 at 9:28:58 PM UTC+5:30, Mohit Shah wrote: &

Re: [sympy] Sympy Document

: > > I think the order you showed in your diagram is correct. They should go > right after the parameters section. > > Aaron Meurer > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 2:26 PM Mohit Shah > wrote: > >> Thanks for the link, >> Can you tell me where we c

[sympy] Use of the tool

Hello, can anyone tell me how to use the tool ./bin/coverage_doctest.py as it will to identify which function is missing docstring and not included in sphinx? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [sympy] Sympy Document

//github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/17715. There was also some > discussion that happened on the mailing list > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sympy/JvcbdzbMN4g/981wq8B-BwAJ. > > Aaron Meurer > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 3:49 PM Mohit Shah > wrote: > >> Sorry, But I didn't get

Re: [sympy] Sympy Document

e we make any changes we should > reference those discussions. > > Aaron Meurer > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 2:34 PM Mohit Shah > wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> In Sympy Documentation >> <https://docs.sympy.org/latest/documentation-style-guide.html>, T

Re: [sympy] Sympy Document

oD project, so before we make any changes we should > reference those discussions. > > Aaron Meurer > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 2:34 PM Mohit Shah > wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> In Sympy Documentation >> <https://docs.sympy.org/latest/documentation-sty

[sympy] Sympy Document

Hello everyone, In Sympy Documentation , There is a section named "DocString sections". I think there must be some changes. Like parameters must be before Examples section and after parameter section, we can add a section for

[sympy] Re: Google Season Of Docs.

Hii Priyanshu Shubham, Have you gone through sympy documentation ? On Monday, June 1, 2020 at 3:06:47 PM UTC+5:30, Priyanshu Shubham wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > As a massive fan of Sympy, I would love to have the opportunity to work

Re: [sympy] Reason for this output.

I got that. :members: only shows non private methods. I got that when I read the document on autodoc again. Is that right? On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 1:55:01 AM UTC+5:30, Mohit Shah wrote: > > [image: SympyAssumption2.PNG] > It is something like this. > > But recently, I saw th

Re: [sympy] Reason for this output.

I got that. :members: only shows non private methods. I got that when I read the document on autodoc again. Thanks. On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 1:55:01 AM UTC+5:30, Mohit Shah wrote: > > [image: SympyAssumption2.PNG] > It is something like this. > > But recently, I saw that I

[sympy] Re: Error while following steps of sympy document

Yes, I tried that as well. I don't know how but when I cloned the project again from github, It worked. Thanks for the help. On Wednesday, May 27, 2020 at 10:08:36 PM UTC+5:30, S.Y. Lee wrote: > > Have you tried > sudo apt-get update > > > On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 10:49:46 PM

[sympy] About Sphinx

Hello everyone, Can anyone tell me how to use sphinx for writing documentation for sympy? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[sympy] GSoC 2020 aspirant

Hii there, I want to contribute to your organization during this summer under GSoC 2020. I liked the idea of ODEs. Can anyone please explain it a little more as i am little confused in that? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To

[sympy] Re: Electromagnetism in SymPy (?)

Hi Ondřej, I have a design structure in mind. I could document it and share it. Basically, I was trying to cover problems related to electrostatics, electric potentials, electric fields, magnetostatics, magnetic fields, and electrodynamics. Your suggestions would help. Thanks. Regards, Mohit

[sympy] Electromagnetism in SymPy (?)

I want to work on a possible electromagnetism module for SymPy. I was also eyeing GSoC 2015 with SymPy where I could work further into the same module. Could anyone guide me or help me as to how I would get started with this module? Thanks. Regards, Mohit Shah Computer Science Undergrad IIT