On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 at 21:46, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 6:54 AM Oscar Benjamin
> wrote:
> >
> > 1. The benchmarks are based on ASV which is awkward to use. It's
> > unnecessarily difficult even just to run a single benchmark. A better
> > framework should be found.
>
> Just
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 6:54 AM Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 14:53, praneeth ratna wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As mentioned in the project description here ,
> > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-Ideas#benchmarks-and-performance ,
> > the sympy_benchmarks misses so
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 14:53, praneeth ratna wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As mentioned in the project description here ,
> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-Ideas#benchmarks-and-performance ,
> the sympy_benchmarks misses some benchmarks which are needed to be shifted
> fro the sympy main repo
Hi all,
As mentioned in the project description here
, https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-Ideas#benchmarks-and-performance
, the sympy_benchmarks misses some benchmarks which are needed to be
shifted fro the sympy main repo. Also the sympy_benchmarks misses
benchmarks for combinatorics,
