On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:15 AM, 2006.uchida2006.uch...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for your responses and I'm sorry for my late response.
Thank you, Ondrej. I want to try to use Pydy, but I don't think I can
have time enough to help the development by testing all the features
of Pydy to find
Luke wrote:
If you are familiar with Autolev, then you are probably familiar with
some of the behavior that makes it very convenient and easy to derive
equations of motion in. You might also be familiar with some of its
limitations. One of the main goals of PyDy is to replicate (in a more
Alan,
I've browsed this text a little, but to be honest, I was unable to
see the direct advantage of such an approach, at least for the type of
work I'm involved with. I'm willing to trust that the mathematics are
cleaner and more complete, but I'm curious what the advantage is in
the end. Do
Hi,
2009/5/29 2006.uchida 2006.uch...@gmail.com:
Thank you for your response. I first knew Autolev.
I took a look at one of the sample test codes of Pydy named
simplependulum.py and didn't look into the details but it appears
that it allows us to obtain motion equations and simulations by
This is cool, it is good to see other people who are familiar with
Kane's method, there aren't many of us :)
Are you familiar with Autolev? With PyDy, I am working to achieve
some of the same behavior as Autolev, but make it even better, and
have a lot more features. I'd love to hear your
