Caleb,
Greetings!
> I am also a physics student, I would have loved to use Sympy for
> calculations in my upper division Quantum Mechanics courses and it
> would be great if I could use Sympy for my upcoming course in General
> Relativity. I looked at some of the Google Summer of Code projects fo
Hi Caleb,
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:17 AM, caleb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am also a physics student, I would have loved to use Sympy for
> calculations in my upper division Quantum Mechanics courses and it
> would be great if I could use Sympy for my upcoming course in General
> Relativity. I looke
Hello,
I am also a physics student, I would have loved to use Sympy for
calculations in my upper division Quantum Mechanics courses and it
would be great if I could use Sympy for my upcoming course in General
Relativity. I looked at some of the Google Summer of Code projects for
Sympy and I am won
If you are doing geometric calculations you should look at section
10.2.2, _Conformal Model of Euclidean Space_ in "Geometric Algebra for
Physicists" by Doran & Lasenby. Their methods greatly simplify the
calculation of geometric transformations and the intersections of lines,
planes, circles
By the way, for the Google Code projects, click on "source" and type
"sympy" into the "Search Trunk" field to get an idea of how they use
it.
I don't know if there's an easy way to do that with GitHub (other than
cloning and "git grep sympy").
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Aaron
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Mateusz Paprocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16 May 2011 07:57, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Matteo Boscolo
>> wrote:
>> > hi all,
>> >
>> > Do not forget PythonCAD ..
>> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/pythoncad/
>> > we are using sympy
Hi,
On 16 May 2011 07:57, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Matteo Boscolo
> wrote:
> > hi all,
> >
> > Do not forget PythonCAD ..
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/pythoncad/
> > we are using sympy for all geometrical operation ..
> >
> > last yeard I made an youtube vi
Matteo,
Good to hear from you again. There have been lots of changes to geometry
making it much more robust for intersection calculations. Hopefully these
will be of use to you.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, se
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Matteo Boscolo
wrote:
> hi all,
>
> Do not forget PythonCAD ..
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/pythoncad/
> we are using sympy for all geometrical operation ..
>
> last yeard I made an youtube video that show how to render sympy data to
> PythonCAD and how to ge
hi all,
Do not forget PythonCAD ..
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pythoncad/
we are using sympy for all geometrical operation ..
last yeard I made an youtube video that show how to render sympy data to
PythonCAD and how to get sympy data from PythonCAD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnxRDj4qy
On 05/13/2011 04:35 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Alan Bromborsky wrote:
On 05/13/2011 11:54 AM, Jeremias Yehdegho wrote:
On 05/13/2011 02:49 AM, Saptarshi Mandal wrote:
The situation in my college is that several people use Matlab/
Mathematica for various reasons
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Alan Bromborsky wrote:
> On 05/13/2011 11:54 AM, Jeremias Yehdegho wrote:
>>
>> On 05/13/2011 02:49 AM, Saptarshi Mandal wrote:
>>>
>>> The situation in my college is that several people use Matlab/
>>> Mathematica for various reasons
>>> and really have no incent
On 05/13/2011 11:54 AM, Jeremias Yehdegho wrote:
On 05/13/2011 02:49 AM, Saptarshi Mandal wrote:
The situation in my college is that several people use Matlab/
Mathematica for various reasons
and really have no incentive to shift to an open source CAS (except
for geek cred) unless it is
easier t
On 05/13/2011 02:49 AM, Saptarshi Mandal wrote:
> The situation in my college is that several people use Matlab/
> Mathematica for various reasons
> and really have no incentive to shift to an open source CAS (except
> for geek cred) unless it is
> easier to use. The reason being that copyright law
Cool. Does your university use SymPy, or is it just something that
you personally use?
And by the way, even if you're not from a developing country, you can
save a lot of money by using open source software (assuming it is of
comparable quality).
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 7:16 PM, li
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 19:40, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Ronan Lamy wrote:
>>> Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 16:41 -0600, Aaron Meurer a écrit :
Would it require the ast module? That is only available on 2.6+. Bu
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 19:40, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Ronan Lamy wrote:
>> Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 16:41 -0600, Aaron Meurer a écrit :
>>> Would it require the ast module? That is only available on 2.6+. But
>>> that's better than nothing. 1/2 vs. S(1)/2 is by fa
Hi I am from the Catholic University of Peru and we use only OS tools
like maxima or octave because academic institutions in developing
countries dont have the funds for buying proprietary software as
mathematica or matlab, campus licensing is very expensive for an
University from a developing coun
The situation in my college is that several people use Matlab/
Mathematica for various reasons
and really have no incentive to shift to an open source CAS (except
for geek cred) unless it is
easier to use. The reason being that copyright laws are lax in India
and many people just download
whatever
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Ronan Lamy wrote:
> Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 16:41 -0600, Aaron Meurer a écrit :
>> Would it require the ast module? That is only available on 2.6+. But
>> that's better than nothing. 1/2 vs. S(1)/2 is by far the number one
>> gotcha that I see.
>
> That's really
Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 16:41 -0600, Aaron Meurer a écrit :
> Would it require the ast module? That is only available on 2.6+. But
> that's better than nothing. 1/2 vs. S(1)/2 is by far the number one
> gotcha that I see.
That's really the only thing that prevents us from using a standard
Python
Yeah, I wouldn't worry about Python 2.4. We are dropping support
right after the release, which will be very soon.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>> Would it require the ast module? That is only availab
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>>
>> We do have classify_ode, the idea of which was stolen from DETools.
>> But I agree that having more of those would be nice. Any specific
>> ones that you would like to have? Ma
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> Would it require the ast module? That is only available on 2.6+. But
> that's better than nothing. 1/2 vs. S(1)/2 is by far the number one
> gotcha that I see.
Here is the file (I think it works for 2.5+):
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/b
Hi,
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> We do have classify_ode, the idea of which was stolen from DETools.
> But I agree that having more of those would be nice. Any specific
> ones that you would like to have? Maybe open issues for them. Having
> a symbolic pde solver wo
Would it require the ast module? That is only available on 2.6+. But
that's better than nothing. 1/2 vs. S(1)/2 is by far the number one
gotcha that I see.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>> I'm undecid
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> I'm undecided if it should be done in isympy. Maybe there should at
> least be an option.
I think we should do it as an option, yes. And we can start using it,
as an option and see how it goes.
> As for how to do it, can sympify be extended
I'm undecided if it should be done in isympy. Maybe there should at
least be an option.
As for how to do it, can sympify be extended to parse any python
expression (like can we make S("for i in range(10): print i") work)?
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>>
>> Have you seen any deficiencies in SymPy like your ETFE that would
>> prevent you from moving?
>>
>> Aaron Meurer
>
> Off the top of my head, something like testeq from Maple would be
> g
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
[...]
> prerequisites for SymPy (like Python itself if you are on Windows).
> If there were a nice GUI that was friendly, like easy access to docs,
> automatic sympification (so no one gets caught by 1/2 problems),
Just curious about this part
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> Have you seen any deficiencies in SymPy like your ETFE that would
> prevent you from moving?
>
> Aaron Meurer
Off the top of my head, something like testeq from Maple would be
great. pdsolve, DETools, and PDETools would be nice as well. Oh,
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Luke wrote:
>> This was pretty much my experience as well. I was introduced to
>> Python in a graduate course and made the migration from Matlab over to
>> Python over the course of a couple of years. In engine
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:51 AM, SherjilOzair wrote:
> A very smart and to-the-point question, Matthew. I've been wanting the
> answer to this question myself when working on my project. The answer
> to this question is critical for code writing.
>
> Another issue I would like to raise, that I be
Hi.
Thanks for starting this discussion. My personal use of SymPy outside
of developing for it has been in the math courses I have taken. Last
semester, I used it a lot in my PDEs course, and occasionally in my
linear algebra course. In both cases, I used it to do difficult
computation, like Ma
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Luke wrote:
> This was pretty much my experience as well. I was introduced to
> Python in a graduate course and made the migration from Matlab over to
> Python over the course of a couple of years. In engineering there are
> few people using open source tools, I
This was pretty much my experience as well. I was introduced to
Python in a graduate course and made the migration from Matlab over to
Python over the course of a couple of years. In engineering there are
few people using open source tools, I think mostly because people get
used to doing things a
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Cory Dominguez wrote:
> As a very small response to this question. My name is Cory Dominguez and I
> am a physics major at University of California at Santa Cruz. I am new to
> this group but I am interested in contributing. This quarter I am taking a
> class is Co
As a very small response to this question. My name is Cory Dominguez and I
am a physics major at University of California at Santa Cruz. I am new to
this group but I am interested in contributing. This quarter I am taking a
class is Computational Physics where we have mainly looked at numerical
ana
A very smart and to-the-point question, Matthew. I've been wanting the
answer to this question myself when working on my project. The answer
to this question is critical for code writing.
Another issue I would like to raise, that I believe is related to this
topic, is a phrase in the Sympy Mission
39 matches
Mail list logo
