On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 6:28 PM, David Li li.david...@gmail.com wrote:
What exactly was the tuple before?
The tuple before was (auto_symbol, auto_number, factorial_notation). The
new function that replaces the tuple iterates through those functions
internally and applies each of them.
I
On Friday, November 23, 2012 2:41:36 AM UTC-7, Aaron Meurer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 6:28 PM, David Li li.da...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
What exactly was the tuple before?
The tuple before was (auto_symbol, auto_number, factorial_notation).
The new function that replaces the
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:53 AM, David Li li.david...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, November 23, 2012 2:41:36 AM UTC-7, Aaron Meurer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 6:28 PM, David Li li.da...@gmail.com wrote:
What exactly was the tuple before?
The tuple before was (auto_symbol,
Hello,
I have been working on the API for parse_expr after having implemented
implicit multiplication, and would like your thoughts on my proposed
changes. Currently in a local branch I have this:
- stringify_expr parses the input and returns a string (this will be
useful for Gamma)
-
On Nov 22, 2012, at 10:41 AM, David Li li.david...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have been working on the API for parse_expr after having implemented
implicit multiplication, and would like your thoughts on my proposed
changes. Currently in a local branch I have this:
- stringify_expr parses the
What exactly was the tuple before?
The tuple before was (auto_symbol, auto_number, factorial_notation). The
new function that replaces the tuple iterates through those functions
internally and applies each of them.
Did you also fix comment 3 of 2663?
I added those cases as tests,
