Re: [sympy] Re: little urgent Proposal review and suggestions

2020-03-28 Thread vinit wadgaonkar
Ok sir I will take Care of that On Sat, 28 Mar, 2020, 4:21 AM Aaron Meurer, wrote: > The application has some materials which were presumably taken from > other sources, but I didn't see any citations. You should cite any > sources in the application. See the last bullet point here > >

[sympy] Vector Integration Proposal for GSoC feedback

2020-03-28 Thread Faisal Riyaz
Dear Developers, Please provide your feedback on my GSoC proposal for Vector Integration. Here is the link to the wiki. https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2020-Application-Faisal-Riyaz:-Implementation-of-Vector-Integration It is still not complete. I am looking forward to your feedback.

[sympy] Re: PR and Issue Policies Drafts

2020-03-28 Thread Muhammed abdul Quadir owais
Sir, can you please tell what about the policy related to, if an author wants review and want to merge, like I've done 5 and all are open and I'm waiting to move further . Are anyone who are assigned for some each modules or anyone who takes the responsibility to look over some modules so that

[sympy] Re: Any way to define a function with parameters?

2020-03-28 Thread Jisoo Song
2020년 3월 28일 토요일 오전 12시 1분 34초 UTC+9, S.Y. Lee 님의 말: > > I don't think that a*x**2 + b*x + c.is actually considered a 'Function', > but just as an 'Expression' in sympy. > And literally you can just apply (a*x**2 + b*x + c).subs({a: 1}) to do > evaluations with respect to any variables. > >

[sympy] PR and Issue Policies Drafts

2020-03-28 Thread Gagandeep Singh (B17CS021)
Hi, The drafts of PR policy and Issue policy have been added to sympy wiki, 1. https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Pull-Request-Policy 2. https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Issue-Policy If you have any suggestions to improve them further then please reply to this thread or just comment at

Re: [sympy] Re: [Discussion] [GSoC] Creating a Java Parser

2020-03-28 Thread Gajjar Smit
Hi Ondrej Sir, Thank you for the suggestions. I will look into it and update it accordingly. I think I can start C Parser implementations from Community Bonding Period itself and start making PRs(there is a whole month and I don't think, it is justifiable only for Community Bonding! Also, I have

[sympy] Re: [Discussion][GSoc] Advancing SymPy Gamma and SymPy live using Natural Language Processing ?

2020-03-28 Thread Nikhil Maan
Hey, I noticed you've only provided a fraction of your project plan and timeline in your proposal. Do you have a plan you'd like to discuss for what you're proposing? And how many and which of the languages you're planning to implement the support for? Also, looking at this, you're

Re: [sympy] Re: [Discussion] [GSoC] Creating a Java Parser

2020-03-28 Thread Nikhil Maan
If you also plan to help out with Fortran, since you'll be improving the previous parsers, I think it'll be better to work on the C and Fortran parser together during the initial period. I'll suggest something like Week 1-6 or the C and Fortran Parser and Week 7-11 on the Java Parser along

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2020: ideas about Efficient Equation of Motion Generation with C++

2020-03-28 Thread TIEMING SUN
Hi Community: I have written the first edition draft of my proposal for GSoC 20, please hit me with any comment or feedback. The topic is *Classical Mechanics: Efficient Equation of Motion Generation with C++*

[sympy] Extending the categories module

2020-03-28 Thread Vatsal Srivastava
Hey everyone, I'm Vatsal Srivastava, 2nd year undergraduate in Mathematics. I have been exploring SymPy for the past few months, and I've finally managed to find something really interesting to work on through GSoC. Here is my proposal: