Re: [sympy] Re: New contributors

That sounds like a good idea. As far as I can tell, it isn't implemented yet, and it should be straightforward. Aaron Meurer On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:31 AM, Christina Zografou wrote: > What about making a class for parabola like the one there already is for >

Re: [sympy] Very Large number Calculations with No Loss in Accuracy ?

It's worth pointing out that if you use exact integers or rationals (you can convert a float to a rational with nsimplify()), then there are no accuracy loss issues, because the result of the calculation will be a (large) rational number, which can be evaluated to a float exactly. Also, if you

Re: [sympy] Fibonacci Reverse Calculation?

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Amy Valhausen wrote: > > Hi Aaron! I have been trying to follow your suggestions to try > > mpmath.phi & sympy.GoldenRatio but I keep getting command line errors when I > try to reference these. These are referencing the names from the

[sympy] Golden Ratio Problem

Golden Ratio Problem I am needing help on designing code that uses a modified form of Binets Formula. I am a newbie to python so am very open to direction and samples you can provide that demonstrate how to structure this in python. I believe I already have a solution in psuedo code (included

[sympy] Very Large number Calculations with No Loss in Accuracy ?

Very Large number Calculations with No Loss in Accuracy ? Given a 1700 digit number, we want to store the value and perform two functions on it with NO loss of accuracy, its ok if calc time takes longer but better if faster. Where x = a 1700 digit long numeric value The two calcs to be

Re: [sympy] Re: New contributors

You could also look through our issues list and try to fix bugs and implement feature requests. There are tons of issues to work on: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues Secondly, a good source for ideas is the GSoC idea page: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2016-Ideas. These are

Re: [sympy] Re: New contributors

If there is are geometric entities that are not implemented in the geometry package, I'm sure that they would be welcome additions. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Christina Zografou < christinazograf...@gmail.com> wrote: > What about making a class for

[sympy] Re: New contributors

What about making a class for parabola like the one there already is for ellipse? Do you think that's something we could do? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

Re: [sympy] Sympy vs Numpy, better accuracy in precision?

On 11 April 2016 at 03:55, Amy Valhausen wrote: > In tried ; > > import mpmath > x = Float("1.4142", 950) > x**6000%400 > > But got the same sort of error message again ; > x = Float("1.4142", 950) > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "", line 1, in >