Re: [sympy] is compatibility builtins broken?

On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 3:48 PM Oscar Benjamin wrote: > > On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 22:38, Chris Smith wrote: > > > > None of them work > > That's what I get for not trying them out! > > > >>> import sympy.core.compatibility.builtins as builtins > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "",

Re: [sympy] is compatibility builtins broken?

On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 22:38, Chris Smith wrote: > > None of them work That's what I get for not trying them out! > >>> import sympy.core.compatibility.builtins as builtins > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "", line 1, in > ImportError: No module named builtins > > >>> from

Re: [sympy] is compatibility builtins broken?

You can do, >>> from sympy.core.compatibility import builtins >>> type = builtins.type On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 4:42 PM Vishesh Mangla wrote: > What do these builtins ought to be doing? > > > > Sent from Mail for > Windows 10 > > > > *From: *Chris

RE: [sympy] is compatibility builtins broken?

What do these builtins ought to be doing? Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Chris Smith Sent: 09 May 2019 03:08 To: sympy Subject: Re: [sympy] is compatibility builtins broken? None of them work >>> import sympy.core.compatibility.builtins as builtins Traceback (most recent call last):  

Re: [sympy] is compatibility builtins broken?

None of them work >>> import sympy.core.compatibility.builtins as builtins Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ImportError: No module named builtins >>> from sympy.core.compatibility.builtins import type Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ImportError:

[sympy] [Season of Docs] Technical writer allocation

Hi everyone, Thank you again for being part of Season of Docs. We're really excited to have you participate and mentor technical writers this year. Before the technical writer application phase begins, I want to clarify how we are allocating technical writers to each organization. This question

Re: [sympy] is compatibility builtins broken?

On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 08:23, Chris Smith wrote: > > Am I doing something wrong here when running Python 2? > > >>> from sympy.core.compatibility import builtins > >>> from builtins import type > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "", line 1, in > ImportError: No module named builtins

Re: [sympy] Re: SymPy - a suggestion

Hi, Also - I think https://www.sagemath.org has a similar purpose, including a custom notebook for symbolic mathematics, that uses Sympy among other engines. Cheers, Matthew On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 10:32 PM Aaron Meurer wrote: > > You may also be interested in SymPy Live

[sympy] Re: 2019 GSoC students announced

On Monday, 6 May 2019 20:12:01 UTC+2, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > > Join me in congratulating these students on their acceptance. > > Congratulations everybody! And good luck to you and your projects! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To

Re: [sympy] is compatibility builtins broken?

Hi Chris, I am using version 1.5-dev > In [2]: from sympy.core.compatibility import builtins > In [3]: from builtins import type > In [4]: Also, > >>> from sympy.core.compatibility import builtins > >>> from builtins import type > >>> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 12:53 PM Chris Smith wrote: >

[sympy] Re: Symbol (Mul. etc. ) object has no attribute 'base'

This was resolve here . On Thursday, April 25, 2019 at 7:29:06 AM UTC-5, Xuemei Gu wrote: > > > [image: error.png] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In addition: > > [image: error.png] > > > I

[sympy] is compatibility builtins broken?

Am I doing something wrong here when running Python 2? >>> from sympy.core.compatibility import builtins >>> from builtins import type Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ImportError: No module named builtins /c -- You received this message because you are subscribed to