Hi Oscar,
Here's a few things that are different in SymEngine than SymPy.
> As an example it would be trivial in SymPy to make substitutions
involving large expressions and many replacements much faster with a
small redesign. The problem though is backwards compatibility: each
expression class
SymPy has been accepted into Google's Season of Docs program again this year.
This year, Jeremy Monat will be working with SymPy to improve the
solvers documentation. You can find more information about the project
at
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 5:01 PM David Bailey wrote:
>
> Thanks again for a near instantaneous reply!
>
> On 15/04/2022 23:39, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> >
> > You are calling arg[0], but arg is already the argument of the
> > function. The [0] is typically only used when you have *args to accept
> >
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 at 21:46, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 6:54 AM Oscar Benjamin
> wrote:
> >
> > 1. The benchmarks are based on ASV which is awkward to use. It's
> > unnecessarily difficult even just to run a single benchmark. A better
> > framework should be found.
>
> Just
Thanks again for a near instantaneous reply!
On 15/04/2022 23:39, Aaron Meurer wrote:
You are calling arg[0], but arg is already the argument of the
function. The [0] is typically only used when you have *args to accept
an arbitrary number of arguments and you want to get the first one.
OK -
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 3:40 PM David Bailey wrote:
>
> Thanks for such an amazingly fast and detailed reply!
>
> On 15/04/2022 21:32, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> >
> > Yes, you can have it separate. The location of a function in the code
> > has no bearing on its behavior.
> That is good!
> > When you
Thanks for such an amazingly fast and detailed reply!
On 15/04/2022 21:32, Aaron Meurer wrote:
Yes, you can have it separate. The location of a function in the code
has no bearing on its behavior.
That is good!
When you run 'import bailey' then 'bailey' will be the module (because
you called
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 6:54 AM Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 14:53, praneeth ratna wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As mentioned in the project description here ,
> > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-Ideas#benchmarks-and-performance ,
> > the sympy_benchmarks misses
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 2:23 PM David Bailey wrote:
>
> Dear Group,
>
> I would like to understand the workings of SymPy a little better, and to
> that end, I thought it would be instructive to create a trivial 'special
> function' that had some or all of the properties of the SymPy in-built
>
Dear Group,
I would like to understand the workings of SymPy a little better, and to
that end, I thought it would be instructive to create a trivial 'special
function' that had some or all of the properties of the SymPy in-built
functions. The following link was helpful:
Hello all,
I am Varenyam Bhardwaj, Currently pursing for Btech in Electronics and
Computer Engineering at Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology.
I have formulated a proposal for the implementation of Bond Graph tools in
sympy.
Due to running low on time, I prioritized formulating the
> Den tors 14 apr. 2022 19:54Qijia Liu skrev:
>>
>> SciPy has simplex method implemented. Do we need to re-implement it in SymPy?
>>
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 at 07:37, Oscar Gustafsson
wrote:
>
> There are two (I think, at least one) PRs that are not merged that does this.
> So it would be better to
Hi Jason,
I have made a draft of my proposal
https://docs.google.com/document/d/13hmPNM2JdEhnMhctH5hsbuTOnA0916WUvrFOzvb98ig/edit?pli=1,
Most of examples were added from here:
https://github.com/moorepants/learn-multibody-dynamics/pull/57, could you
please provide your feedback on my
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 14:53, praneeth ratna wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As mentioned in the project description here ,
> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-Ideas#benchmarks-and-performance ,
> the sympy_benchmarks misses some benchmarks which are needed to be shifted
> fro the sympy main
Hi all,
I have already mailed regarding my interest in the project - Benchmarks
and performance but have not recieved a reply , could the potential mentor
please guide me on this project?
Thanks,
Praneeth
On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 8:23:10 PM UTC+5:30 praneeth ratna wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 18:54, Qijia Liu wrote:
>
> SciPy has simplex method implemented. Do we need to re-implement it in SymPy?
The SciPy implementation only works for floats. It should be possible
to solve linear programming problems at least using exact rational
numbers. Something like this
There are two (I think, at least one) PRs that are not merged that does
this. So it would be better to sort one of those out. Iirc there is
limiterd work left, like documentation and testing.
BR Oscar
Den tors 14 apr. 2022 19:54Qijia Liu skrev:
> SciPy has simplex method implemented. Do we
17 matches
Mail list logo
