This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/sympy/sympy/builds/2054782)
(merged 85cd5a99 into 65b65820).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1468#issuecomment-7544733
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Tom, how do you feel about putting in the new multiplication_theorem
algorithm that doesn't depend on the order of terms? And how about not
doing simplification of the differences? If you don't simplify terms
then I *think* the gamma args will sort so that the rationals, for a
given residual (arg
+The plotting uses an adaptive algorithm which samples recursively to
+accurately plot the plot. The adaptive algorithm uses a random point near
+the midpoint of two points that has to be further sampled. Hence the same
+plots can appear slightly different.
+
+Usage
+
+
+The plotting uses an adaptive algorithm which samples recursively to
+accurately plot the plot. The adaptive algorithm uses a random point near
+the midpoint of two points that has to be further sampled. Hence the same
+plots can appear slightly different.
+
+Usage
+
+``xlim`` : tuple of two floats, denoting the x - axis limits.
+
+``ylim`` : tuple of two floats, denoting the y - axis limits.
+
+Examples
+
+ plot_line(x**2, (x, -5, 5))
+
+Multiple plots
+ plot_line((x**2, (x, -6, 6)), (x, (x, -5, 5)))
+
+
Why create a new file for this?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1468#issuecomment-7545659
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group, send email to
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/sympy/sympy/builds/2055088)
(merged 1bce5308 into 65b65820).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1462#issuecomment-7545954
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #7 on issue 3349 by smi...@gmail.com: gremlin in master
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3349
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To
@smichr @gilbertgede @moorepants @hazelnusse
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/angadhn/sympy kanechanges
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1469
-- Commit Summary --
* Fixed an error in
Updates:
Status: Valid
Comment #8 on issue 3349 by smi...@gmail.com: gremlin in master
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3349
The following is being printed in Windows durint testing of ipython with
2.7:
sympy\interactive\tests\test_ipython.py[1] WARNING: Readline
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/sympy/sympy/builds/2056368)
(merged 84a5ea6f into 65b65820).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1460#issuecomment-7550552
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/sympy/sympy/builds/2056427)
(merged 67270875 into 98cc80f0).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1469#issuecomment-7551074
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
**SymPy Bot Summary:** :eight_spoked_asterisk: All tests have passed.
*Test command:* setup.py test
*master hash*: 98cc80f01b82534e243cfb791d5977f18bb2414e
*branch hash*: 67270875bd85734785bb24816d2ec3d968e8a960
**Interpreter 1:** :eight_spoked_asterisk: All tests have passed.
*Interpreter:*
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/sympy/sympy/builds/2056716)
(merged cff42d03 into 65b65820).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1462#issuecomment-7552075
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Should I add tests like `isinstance(X + X, ImmutableMatrix)`?
This seems odd to me in some way. It doesn't test the mathematics but instead
tests nitty-gritty implementation details.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
+ from sympy.categories import Object, NamedMorphism
+ from sympy.categories import Diagram, DiagramGrid
+ from sympy import FiniteSet
+ A = Object(A)
+ B = Object(B)
+ C = Object(C)
+ f = NamedMorphism(A, B, f)
+ g = NamedMorphism(B, C, g)
+ diagram =
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/sympy/sympy/builds/2057075)
(merged 47b76408 into 41e968b8).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1429#issuecomment-7553680
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
**SymPy Bot Summary:** :red_circle: There were test failures.
@catchmrbharath: Please fix the test failures.
*Test command:* setup.py test
*master hash*: 98cc80f01b82534e243cfb791d5977f18bb2414e
*branch hash*: 85cd5a99c5f32d08e756b0c827c3c5c46086ea65
**Interpreter 1:** :red_circle: There were
@ness01 , thanks for the extra round of review! I have fixed everything you
have pointed out, including fixing all whitespace in writing `dicts`.
I get the same errors with Python 3.3, but I get them all over SymPy anyway, so
I believe they are hardly introduced by my code.
---
Reply to this
**SymPy Bot Summary:** :eight_spoked_asterisk: All tests have passed.
*Test command:* setup.py test
*master hash*: 98cc80f01b82534e243cfb791d5977f18bb2414e
*branch hash*: e3a033ee001d38b4c7e84a3e03ca39d25bfe3f0e
**Interpreter 1:** :eight_spoked_asterisk: All tests have passed.
*Interpreter:*
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/sympy/sympy/builds/2057716)
(merged f0e1229b into 98cc80f0).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1430#issuecomment-7556081
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Chris, if you say this is better and all tests still pass I won't object.
Looking at my code again I see how terrible it is :/.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1462#issuecomment-7558167
--
You received this message because you are
**SymPy Bot Summary:** :eight_spoked_asterisk: All tests have passed.
*Test command:* setup.py test
*master hash*: 98cc80f01b82534e243cfb791d5977f18bb2414e
*branch hash*: cff42d0365a58489349b93a279178dd82ef617f1
**Interpreter 1:** :eight_spoked_asterisk: All tests have passed.
*Interpreter:*
@scolobb solid work! I'll review diagram-drawing as soon as I can.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1429#issuecomment-7558407
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to
Can you rebase this onto master? It seems the commits from diagram-layout are
still shown here...
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1430#issuecomment-7560834
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/sympy/sympy/builds/2059543)
(merged d9efa1ea into 65b65820).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1468#issuecomment-7562251
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
**SymPy Bot Summary:** :eight_spoked_asterisk: All tests have passed.
*Test command:* setup.py test
*master hash*: 3c2c3c755445737074de437f004143792f5057e3
*branch hash*: ac679d1dba3a92e2d1e03a311d2110b696cbce5d
**Interpreter 1:** :eight_spoked_asterisk: All tests have passed.
*Interpreter:*
@ness01 , done; sorry, I totally forgot to rebase this branch :-(
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1430#issuecomment-7562441
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to
A generalized speed was incorrectly defined. I redid the kinematics and
verified this.
It doesn't affect the test in anyway.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1469#issuecomment-7562585
--
You received this message because you are
On 07.08.2012 19:32, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
@ness01 https://github.com/ness01 , done; sorry, I totally forgot to
rebase this branch :-(
No problem. I'll start the reviewing tomorrow.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
No problem. I'll start the reviewing tomorrow.
Cool!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1430#issuecomment-7562688
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group,
Or you could test for specific matrices.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1467#issuecomment-7562891
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group, send email to
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/sympy/sympy/builds/2059822)
(merged d4bdaa5e into 3c2c3c75).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1430#issuecomment-7563321
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
@ness01, thanks!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1430#issuecomment-7563450
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group, send email to
**SymPy Bot Summary:** :eight_spoked_asterisk: All tests have passed.
*Test command:* setup.py test
*master hash*: 3c2c3c755445737074de437f004143792f5057e3
*branch hash*: 82a723cc03d466ecd6da09896abccdc76e24be4c
**Interpreter 1:** :eight_spoked_asterisk: All tests have passed.
*Interpreter:*
This patch looks good to me and it passes all tests.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1454#issuecomment-7567618
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group,
**SymPy Bot Summary:** :eight_spoked_asterisk: All tests have passed.
*Test command:* setup.py test
*master hash*: 3c2c3c755445737074de437f004143792f5057e3
*branch hash*: d4bdaa5ef2ef792521bbbcbd5a89ccf3efce802e
**Interpreter 1:** :eight_spoked_asterisk: All tests have passed.
*Interpreter:*
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #4 on issue 3182 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Option to isympy to
automatically use Rational for int/int
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3182
See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1470.
--
You received this message because you are
OK, some tests added.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1470#issuecomment-7569394
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group, send email to
OK, I'll merge it then.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1454#issuecomment-7569421
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group, send email to
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/sympy/sympy/builds/2061827)
(merged a8eb22cc into 3c2c3c75).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1470#issuecomment-7569610
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/sympy/sympy/builds/2061912)
(merged 42fdfe2e into 3c2c3c75).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1470#issuecomment-7569686
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Huh, apparently binary literals were added in Python 2.6. I did not know that.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1470#issuecomment-7569709
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
**SymPy Bot Summary:** :eight_spoked_asterisk: All tests have passed.
*Test command:* setup.py test
*master hash*: 3c2c3c755445737074de437f004143792f5057e3
*branch hash*: 47b7640842f9d79acbc9f2e50cd80b5880828ece
**Interpreter 1:** :eight_spoked_asterisk: All tests have passed.
*Interpreter:*
**[SymPy Bot][sympy-bot] Summary**: :red_circle: There were test failures
(merged raoulb/lazy_orthogonal_polynomials
(82a723cc03d466ecd6da09896abccdc76e24be4c) into master
(c7a4a4a39b9154670f218265e76fd778f6bf487b)).
@raoulb: Please fix the test failures.
**Build HTML Docs:** :red_circle:
**[SymPy Bot][sympy-bot] Summary**: :red_circle: There were test failures
(merged asmeurer/test_colors (f8e8af88029d992b6267dc0c6fc29f90e436f480) into
master (c7a4a4a39b9154670f218265e76fd778f6bf487b)).
@asmeurer: Please fix the test failures.
**Build HTML Docs:** :red_circle: There were test
**[SymPy Bot][sympy-bot] Summary**: :red_circle: There were test failures
(merged scolobb/ct1-diagram-layout (47b7640842f9d79acbc9f2e50cd80b5880828ece)
into master (c7a4a4a39b9154670f218265e76fd778f6bf487b)).
@scolobb: Please fix the test failures.
**Build HTML Docs:** :red_circle: There were
@scolobb I think these doc failures are due to this branch.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1429#issuecomment-7570118
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this
Okay, I've reverted to the old backend and changed the Sphinx frontend. I am
pushing the changes...
Also, there seems to be a bug in the normal backend: the code
c, d = var('c d')
print c
c
print d
d
def ctimesd():
...
... This function returns
+from tokenize import generate_tokens, untokenize, NUMBER, NAME, OP
+from StringIO import StringIO
+
+result = []
+g = generate_tokens(StringIO(s).readline) # tokenize the string
+for toknum, tokval, _, _, _ in g:
+if toknum == NUMBER and '.' not in tokval: #
+# Check the cell for syntax errors. This way, the syntax error
+# will show the original input, not the transformed input. The
+# downside here is that IPython magic like %timeit will not work
+# with transformed input (but on the other hand,
+Example
+===
+
+ from sympy.interactive.session import int_to_Integer
+ from sympy import Integer
+ s = '1.2 + 1/2 - 0x12 + a1'
+ int_to_Integer(s)
+'1.2 +Integer (1 )/Integer (2 )-Integer (0x12 )+a1 '
+ s = 'print (1/2)'
+ int_to_Integer(s)
+
It appears that defining a function deletes all user-defined names.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy-live/pull/59#issuecomment-7571543
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post
@@ -129,6 +129,27 @@ COMMAND LINE OPTIONS
example, if you define a function in isympy with an undefined
Symbol, it will not work.
+See also the -i and -I options.
+
+-i, --int-to-Integer
+
+Automatically wrap int literals with Integer. This makes it so that
+
But otherwise great job on the patch.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1429#issuecomment-7571681
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group, send email to
@angadhn, can you please address all Aaron's and Jason's comments above? E.g.
things about the isinstance as well as the +=. Then we can merge it.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1407#issuecomment-7571749
--
You received this message
+below_eye = zeros(n+m,n)
+A =
(self.mass_matrix).col_join((self._m_cd).row_join(zeros(m,m)))
+below_I = below_eye.row_join(A)
+return I.col_join(below_I)
+else:
+ A = row1.col_join(row2)
+ return A
+
+
+# of the string fixed frame is redefined as 'LagrangesMethod' doesn't
require
+# generalized speeds, per se. (Lagrangian mechanics requires 'simple'
+# generalized speeds)
+A.orientnew('A', 'Axis', [q, N.z])
+A.set_ang_vel(N, qd *A.z)
+P.v2pt_theory(O,N,A)
+T
+The system's mass matrix
+
+forcing : Matrix
+The system's forcing vector
+
+mass_matrix_full : Matrix
+The mass matrix for the qdot's, qdoubledot's, and the
+lagrange multipliers (lam)
+
+forcing_full : Matrix
+The forcing vector for
Hi @certik, I believe I have already addressed the issues.
https://github.com/angadhn/sympy/commit/53b6bc2d1f2dd99f6d27a4c154481fa463b0a2ec
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1407#issuecomment-7571850
--
You received this message because
I verified that the test is being run and that it doesn't matter. (You can even
remove the cos() denominator altogether and it still passes.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1469#issuecomment-7571857
--
You received this message because
You seem to have some trailing whitespace problems there:
http://travis-ci.org/#!/sympy/sympy/jobs/2056371
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1460#issuecomment-7571865
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I think the problem is in the split function. It should not split out the last
line in a function definition.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy-live/pull/59#issuecomment-7571871
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
So I *think* the correct solution is to check in split if the last line begins
with whitespace, and to not include it in the eval code if it does. But I'm
still trying to understand the code here, so it may not be right.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
First one note for any PR just keep adding patches to your branch, so that
we can quickly see what has changed and one can read the whole PR as a history
or story. If you rebase, then suddenly all the test results stop having any
sense.
Only at the very end, when the PR is ready to go in,
+from tokenize import generate_tokens, untokenize, NUMBER, NAME, OP
+from StringIO import StringIO
+
+result = []
+g = generate_tokens(StringIO(s).readline) # tokenize the string
+for toknum, tokval, _, _, _ in g:
+if toknum == NUMBER and '.' not in tokval: #
for e in bodylist:
if isinstance(e, (RigidBody, Particle)):
-lm_individual = e.linearmomentum(frame)
-linearmomentum_sys = linearmomentum_sys + lm_individual
+lm_individual = e.linear_momentum(frame)
+
+from tokenize import generate_tokens, untokenize, NUMBER, NAME, OP
+from StringIO import StringIO
+
+result = []
+g = generate_tokens(StringIO(s).readline) # tokenize the string
+for toknum, tokval, _, _, _ in g:
+if toknum == NUMBER and '.' not in tokval: #
10*N.x + 500*N.y
+bodylist = list(bodylist)
if not isinstance(bodylist, list):
@angadhn, this comment still applies I think.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1407/files#r1328300
--
You received this message
+ from sympy.physics.mechanics import Point, Particle, ReferenceFrame
+ from sympy.physics.mechanics import RigidBody, outer,
potential_energy
+ from sympy import symbols
+ M, m, g, h = symbols('M m g h')
+ N = ReferenceFrame('N')
+ O = Point('O')
+
+from tokenize import generate_tokens, untokenize, NUMBER, NAME, OP
+from StringIO import StringIO
+
+result = []
+g = generate_tokens(StringIO(s).readline) # tokenize the string
+for toknum, tokval, _, _, _ in g:
+if toknum == NUMBER and '.' not in tokval: #
+Example
+===
+
+ from sympy.interactive.session import int_to_Integer
+ from sympy import Integer
+ s = '1.2 + 1/2 - 0x12 + a1'
+ int_to_Integer(s)
+'1.2 +Integer (1 )/Integer (2 )-Integer (0x12 )+a1 '
+ s = 'print (1/2)'
+ int_to_Integer(s)
+
@@ -129,6 +129,27 @@ COMMAND LINE OPTIONS
example, if you define a function in isympy with an undefined
Symbol, it will not work.
+See also the -i and -I options.
+
+-i, --int-to-Integer
+
+Automatically wrap int literals with Integer. This makes it so that
+
Looks like you rebased again...
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1407#issuecomment-7572129
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group, send email to
Well, that doesn't seem to work. So I'm at a loss here.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy-live/pull/59#issuecomment-7572186
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/sympy/sympy/builds/2062711)
(merged 1ba125ec into bd49e6a0).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1407#issuecomment-7572588
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/sympy/sympy/builds/2062721)
(merged c1aaae19 into 3c2c3c75).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1470#issuecomment-7572864
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
+
+self.lam_vec = Matrix([])
+
+
+# Creating the qs, qdots and qdoubledots
+
+q_list = list(q_list)
+if not isinstance(q_list, list):
+raise TypeError('Generalized coords. must be supplied in a list')
+self._q = q_list
+
Must've done that again mistakenly. Apologies.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1407#issuecomment-7573127
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group, send
+
+ from sympy.physics.mechanics import Particle, Point, outer
+ from sympy.physics.mechanics import RigidBody, ReferenceFrame
+ from sympy import symbols
+ b = ReferenceFrame('b')
+ M, g, h = symbols('M g h')
+ P = Point('P')
+ I =
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/sympy/sympy/builds/2063189)
(merged caa2aa88 into bd49e6a0).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1407#issuecomment-7573678
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
if not isinstance(bodylist, list):
raise TypeError('System elements must be supplied as a list')
else:
-linearmomentum_sys = 0
+linear_momentum_sys = 0
Would returning S(0) here be better, to get a SymPy object? I've had other
difficulties in mechanics
if not isinstance(bodylist, list):
raise TypeError('System elements must be supplied as a list')
else:
-angularmomentum_sys = 0
+angular_momentum_sys = 0
Same comment about S(0)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
+self.lam_coeffs = -coneqs_mat.jacobian(qd)
+
+#Determining the third term in Lagrange's EOM
+#term3 = ((self.lam_vec).transpose() *
self.lam_coeffs).transpose()
+term3 = self.lam_coeffs.transpose() * self.lam_vec
+
+#Taking the
+below_eye = zeros(n+m,n)
+A =
(self.mass_matrix).col_join((self._m_cd).row_join(zeros(m,m)))
+below_I = below_eye.row_join(A)
+return I.col_join(below_I)
+else:
+ A = row1.col_join(row2)
+ return A
+
+
@angadhn FYI: the online docs also have the error:
http://docs.sympy.org/dev/modules/physics/mechanics/examples.html#the-rolling-disc
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1469#issuecomment-7574485
--
You received this message because you
There's a tiny bit of cleanup in the processing of a run in the code, but
that will have to wait. My computer just died and I don't know when it will be
fixed. In any case, it's a minor change that can be added later. Since this is
passing and Tom is OK with the changes, I will commit this.
There's a tiny bit of cleanup in the processing of a run in the code, but
that will have to wait. My computer just died and I don't know when it will be
fixed. In any case, it's a minor change that can be added later. Since this is
passing and Tom is OK with the changes, I will commit this.
@angadhn , will you fix the error in the docs, too? (Just want to make sure
this doesn't get forgotten as we move towards the release of 0.7.2).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1469#issuecomment-7574702
--
You received this message
yup.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1469#issuecomment-7574706
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-patches@googlegroups.com.
To
**SymPy Bot Summary:** :eight_spoked_asterisk: All tests have passed.
*Test command:* setup.py test
*master hash*: bd49e6a0b3815b22c559f18535c0e48ab6dfec12
*branch hash*: c1aaae19b1503bc5fe6e38de5193edd2c99843f0
**Interpreter 1:** :eight_spoked_asterisk: All tests have passed.
*Interpreter:*
Anyway, you don't have to fix that here. It's a bug in master, not a
regression, so it doesn't have any barring on this PR. Are you planning to do
more here, or should I review to merge?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
92 matches
Mail list logo
