Re: possible patch for rndis_host

2010-02-11 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2010 23:04:28 schrieb Mark Ellis: > > This means doing DMA on the stack. int_buf needs to be allocated with > > kmalloc() > > preferably during probe(). > > > > Ok, that makes sense. Can you make a version of your patch addressing this? > > Can you comment on why this

Re: possible patch for rndis_host

2010-02-10 Thread Mark Ellis
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:43 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Sonntag, 7. Februar 2010 20:39:05 schrieb Mark Ellis: > > > This patch seems to be very effective, but as I mentioned, none of us > > are really device side developers, and John was never completely > > convinced this was correct. Quotin

Re: possible patch for rndis_host

2010-02-09 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Sonntag, 7. Februar 2010 20:39:05 schrieb Mark Ellis: > This patch seems to be very effective, but as I mentioned, none of us > are really device side developers, and John was never completely > convinced this was correct. Quoting him from a while back > > "The reason I consider it dirty i

Re: possible patch for rndis_host

2010-02-07 Thread Mark Ellis
synce-devel... Didn't hear back from Ole André, so I thought I'd see what the kernel usb guys said. On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 20:39 +0100, Mark Ellis wrote: > Below is a patch we've had at the synce project for some time now, I was > hoping for some guidance. None of us are really kernel level develo