Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 17:44 +0100, Graham Cobb wrote: > On 26/10/16 17:10, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > I'll try that, thanks for the hint... yes, it helped. > > Good. > > > I'm now running into some new conversion issues for calendar data (time > > zone related). To be checked. > > I can't say I am

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

Patrick Ohly wrote: > Thanks. I've merged the patches and will prepare a final release > candidate now. The nightly build machine needs to go through some > maintenance soon, so I might have to finish 1.5.2 this weekend. > > In the future, can you commit the changes in your local git repo with a

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 22:09 +0200, deloptes wrote: > I splitted both (tde and tdepim) > > tde.patch is to prevent the wallet backend from crashing syncevolution when > enabled. Again tdewallet backend is not tested by any means as I am not > using it. > > tdepim.patch is to make the notes

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On 26/10/16 17:10, Patrick Ohly wrote: > I'll try that, thanks for the hint... yes, it helped. Good. > I'm now running into some new conversion issues for calendar data (time > zone related). To be checked. I can't say I am surprised. The time zone stuff is fairly fragile -- I seem to remember

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 16:05 +0100, Graham Cobb wrote: > > Any idea how to proceed with this? Is the policy-key workaround perhaps > > not working as intended? > > No, it is nothing to do with policy-key. That gives different symptoms: > either OK status but 0-length response or some 4nn status

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On 26/10/16 15:21, Patrick Ohly wrote: > I am using the policy-key workaround, but haven't actually verified > whether it is needed. I haven't done exhaustive testing, but I think it is needed if the policy-key in gsettings would otherwise be reset (i.e. null). In other words, if you are

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 19:11 +0100, Graham Cobb wrote: > On 23/10/16 15:51, Graham Cobb wrote: > > I don't think that is a regression in this version (I guess the previous > > version has the same problem), although until I can work out exactly > > what is happening I can't be sure. I will look

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 14:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: >> I've finished preparing source code and binaries for a 1.5.2 release of >> SyncEvolution. The source code has not been tagged yet, only the master >> branches of syncevolution, libsynthesis and activesyncd were

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

I splitted both (tde and tdepim) tde.patch is to prevent the wallet backend from crashing syncevolution when enabled. Again tdewallet backend is not tested by any means as I am not using it. tdepim.patch is to make the notes backend build. Unfortunately I was still not able to perform an e2e

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On 23/10/16 15:51, Graham Cobb wrote: > I don't think that is a regression in this version (I guess the previous > version has the same problem), although until I can work out exactly > what is happening I can't be sure. I will look into it a little further > but I may not be able to fix it

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On 23/10/16 10:51, Graham Cobb wrote: > I will try to find some time this week to copy libwbxml2.so.1 to my > jessie system and do some functional testing of the release. Hmm. Things are no longer working for me. HOWEVER, since I last tried, my employer has moved me to Office365!!! I strongly

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On 21/10/16 19:46, Patrick Ohly wrote: > These are all problems which should have been caught by the automated > testing. I really need to sign up for some hosted Exchange service :-/ On that note, I am on holiday from Friday for 2 weeks. I am unlikely to be able to do any testing while I am

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

Patrick Ohly wrote: > deloptes, your TDE backends are included, albeit with some changes to > make them compile when disabled. Please check that this works as > intended for you. Two minor problems. After applying the changes (see attached patch) it builds fine. I do not expect functional

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 18:04 +0100, Graham Cobb wrote: > On 16/10/16 20:33, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > I've update the "experimental" and "unstable" repo and published > > versions 1.5.1+20161014+SE+46a81a3+SYSYNC+7c9a4bf (SyncEvolution) and > > 0.92+20161014+SE+8918ba1 (activesyncd). > > > > I have

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On 16/10/16 20:33, Patrick Ohly wrote: > I've update the "experimental" and "unstable" repo and published > versions 1.5.1+20161014+SE+46a81a3+SYSYNC+7c9a4bf (SyncEvolution) and > 0.92+20161014+SE+8918ba1 (activesyncd). > I have installed on my production (Debian Jessie) system. This installed

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

Patrick Ohly wrote: > deloptes, your TDE backends are included, albeit with some changes to > make them compile when disabled. Please check that this works as > intended for you. Hi Patrick, I let it compile yesterday on a test vm and got following error src/backends/tde/TDEPlatform.cpp: In

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 14:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > I've finished preparing source code and binaries for a 1.5.2 release of > SyncEvolution. The source code has not been tagged yet, only the master > branches of syncevolution, libsynthesis and activesyncd were updated. > activesyncd continues

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On 07/10/16 12:19, Patrick Ohly wrote: > Sorry, forgot about that question: I granted your account additional > roles, so you should be able to edit > https://syncevolution.org/wiki/ms-exchange-and-kde-synchronization (and > other pages) now. Thanks. I have added the gsettings instructions now.

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 10:59 +0100, Graham Cobb wrote: > On 03/10/16 19:00, Graham Cobb wrote: > > If you can build packages with the fixes to the two bugs I found I will > > test them out (might not be until the end of the week, though). > > I think the two bugs (98014 and 98026) are all that are

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On 03/10/16 19:00, Graham Cobb wrote: > If you can build packages with the fixes to the two bugs I found I will > test them out (might not be until the end of the week, though). I think the two bugs (98014 and 98026) are all that are needed to avoid ActiveSync regrssion in 1.5.2. But I would be

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

Tino Mettler wrote: > "3.4.0.47.5+syncevolution-1.5.1-2" might scare off some people. I would skip "syncevolution" and go for "3.4.0.47.5+1.5.1-2" It's just a convention, so important is, that it's written somewhere what it means. regards ___

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 14:01:07 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > Can't you do that with a libsynthesis >= Debian-Version where > "Debian-Version" gets bumped each time you update the libsynthesis > source code? Hi, thats what I'm doing now. However, versions like "3.4.0.47.5+syncevolution-1.5.1-2"

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 12:38 +0200, Tino Mettler wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 12:29:23 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 11:21 +0200, Tino Mettler wrote: > > > > Is it intended that there was no version bump in libsynthesis for quite > > > some time? > > > > There's been no

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 12:29:23 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 11:21 +0200, Tino Mettler wrote: > > Is it intended that there was no version bump in libsynthesis for quite > > some time? > > There's been no new upstream release. Hi, my understanding was that syncevolution

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

Hi, I updated the Debian packaging and it builds and installs fine. I hope to get some basic testing done this week. Is it intended that there was no version bump in libsynthesis for quite some time? Regards, Tino ___ SyncEvolution mailing list

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On 03/10/16 13:39, Graham Cobb wrote: > I notice that there are a number of other warnings in the activesyncd > build. I am not sure I will get a chance to review them until next weekend. Actually there aren't that many. I reviewed them quickly and they all seem to be about deprecated Glib

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On 02/10/16 23:04, Graham Cobb wrote: > On 02/10/16 14:39, Patrick Ohly wrote: >> On Sun, 2016-10-02 at 14:21 +0100, Graham Cobb wrote: >>> activesyncd now works without crashing. But it is being sent empty data >>> by the server. So some more work to do. >> >> Please share your progress. I

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

Patrick Ohly wrote on Thu, 29 Sep 2016 14:45:00 +0200: > Before I tag and release this as 1.5.2, it would be great to get some > feedback that this release doesn't cause regressions. I just built it on my Arch machine, and it appears to function correctly. The only

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On 02/10/16 14:39, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-02 at 14:21 +0100, Graham Cobb wrote: >> activesyncd now works without crashing. But it is being sent empty data >> by the server. So some more work to do. > > Please share your progress. I consider this a 1.5.2 release blocker. Still

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On Sun, 2016-10-02 at 14:21 +0100, Graham Cobb wrote: > On 01/10/16 18:00, Graham Cobb wrote: > > I have just tried to run a quick check that sync with Exchange > > Activesync is working. It isn't (activesyncd is exiting due to a > > "Trace/breakpoint trap"). > > OK, I have tracked that problem

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On Sat, 2016-10-01 at 18:00 +0100, Graham Cobb wrote: > On 29/09/16 13:45, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > Before I tag and release this as 1.5.2, it would be great to get some > > feedback that this release doesn't cause regressions. In particular, > > syncing with phones over Bluetooth needs some

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On 01/10/16 18:00, Graham Cobb wrote: > I have just tried to run a quick check that sync with Exchange > Activesync is working. It isn't (activesyncd is exiting due to a > "Trace/breakpoint trap"). OK, I have tracked that problem down. It is a packaging problem with the new GSettings schema

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On 29/09/16 13:45, Patrick Ohly wrote: > Before I tag and release this as 1.5.2, it would be great to get some > feedback that this release doesn't cause regressions. In particular, > syncing with phones over Bluetooth needs some testing because there has > been one change that I couldn't fully

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 13:37 +0200, deloptes wrote: > Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > http://downloads.syncevolution.org/syncevolution. Look for version > > 1.5.1+20160926+SE+8fccc44+unclean+SYSYNC+59b55aa > > > > Before I tag and release this as 1.5.2, it would be great to get some > > feedback that

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 14:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > Before I tag and release this as 1.5.2, it would be great to get some > feedback that this release doesn't cause regressions. Hi, I cannot speak for runtime, but I was able to build the tarballs in Fedora rawhide without any issue,

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 23:50 +0200, deloptes wrote: >> Patrick Ohly wrote: >> >> > The binaries are available in the "experimental" apt repo >> > (http://downloads.syncevolution.org/apt/ with "experimental" as release >> > name) or as individual .tar.gz files in >> >

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 23:50 +0200, deloptes wrote: > Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > The binaries are available in the "experimental" apt repo > > (http://downloads.syncevolution.org/apt/ with "experimental" as release > > name) or as individual .tar.gz files in > >

Re: [SyncEvolution] Release preparations for 1.5.2

Patrick Ohly wrote: > The binaries are available in the "experimental" apt repo > (http://downloads.syncevolution.org/apt/ with "experimental" as release > name) or as individual .tar.gz files in > http://downloads.syncevolution.org/syncevolution. Look for version >