Re: [Synfig-devl] c++11 : lvalue required as unary '&' operand << stack allocation ?

2016-01-21 Thread d . j . a . y
> From: Ivan Mahonin - 2016-01-20 21:27:29 > > Hello! > > I think following code will save us: > > - Array arr_surface(().real()); > + Array arr_surface((Real*)()); Now i can do a full c++11 synfig-core build ! Thank's Ivan... let's do it again ...

[Synfig-devl] Wiki and Forum : core questions

2016-01-21 Thread d . j . a . y
Hello list again... They are two subjects where some core guru help are needed: Forum : "Question on coordinates system" http://www.synfig.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14=9886 Wiki : Sif_Format http://wiki.synfig.org/Talk:Sif_Format http://wiki.synfig.org/Sif_Format see'ya

[Synfig-devl] C++11 backward compatibility ?

2016-01-21 Thread d . j . a . y
Hello list, About C++11 compliance / migration ... What do think does i do a compliance or a migration ? Does we what backward compatibility ? I mean, i'm doing work for being able to build under C++11 condition. Until now, i still can build under C++98, but if i follow (changing NULL / 0

Re: [Synfig-devl] C++11 backward compatibility ?

2016-01-21 Thread Konstantin Dmitriev
2016-01-21 15:21 GMT+06:00 : > Hello list, > > About C++11 compliance / migration ... > > What do think does i do a compliance or a migration ? I prefer to keep the possibility to build on C++98. Best Regards, K.