Re: Fwd: Re: Errors since upgrading to 3.4.1: "meta test ... with a zero score"

Thought. Get the update nums from previous turn back on and copy those files to a higher number and update dns. That will revert back to last known good. Regards, KAM On June 15, 2017 9:24:37 PM EDT, Dave Jones wrote: >Ugg! I asked for some help QA'ing the rules for over a

Fwd: Re: Errors since upgrading to 3.4.1: "meta test ... with a zero score"

Ugg! I asked for some help QA'ing the rules for over a week but got zero response then. I wonder if what was in SVN wasn't what was really running on the old masscheck box. I used what was in SVN. I guess I will dig through the old VM backup to see if I can find the difference related to

Re: Fwd: New CrashPlan Backup Alerts

On 6/15/2017 1:30 PM, Dave Jones wrote: It is Java... We could setup supervisord to make sure it's running. Joking aside, I have this on a lot of boxes. We changed RAM & CPUs. I'll keep an eye on it for now.

Re: Adding RBLs to default SA rules

Have you checked out the Invaluement RBL? Rob will give you a free trial. On 06/15/2017 08:53 AM, Bryan Vest wrote: I am corrected then, if a score of 0 will not even hit the RBL then that wipes out most of what I said. The way our internal rbldnsd works it never has more than about 120k

Re: Adding RBLs to default SA rules

I am corrected then, if a score of 0 will not even hit the RBL then that wipes out most of what I said. The way our internal rbldnsd works it never has more than about 120k entries in it, we dont rsync from anyone it is maintained by perl scripts that have been doing the job pretty well for

checkMasscheckContribs.sh on sa-vm1.apache.org - not enough contributors for SVN 1798802

Corpus total: 128, Old: 82, Recent: 20, New: 22 SVN tagged rev in nightly_mass_check: 1798802 New masscheck submission listings in the past day: SVN rev (Match) File Name (Date) 1798802 (Yes) - spam-darxus.log (Jun 15 09:09) 1798802 (Yes) - ham-kgolding.log (Jun 15 11:56) 1798802

Re: Main Developer

On RBL's if my thinking is correct even if the score is zero it will still slow down the processing as it would still go look at the RBL. That is why the system I manage temporarily mirror's RBL's on a local machine using rbldnsd. Though we expire all records if we have seen no activity from that