Re: [Syslog] Secure substrate - need your input

Chris Lonvick wrote: Hi Folks, I'll be asking this in Vancouver but would like to get some input from the mailing list. Our charter says that we will develop a secure method to transport syslog messages. We have BEEP (RFC 3195) but it has a low implementation record. Other groups have spec

[Syslog] syslog-protocol - is it going to be used?

Hi Folks, From the notes I've been getting and the recent discussion on the mailing list, I'd like to ask for a sanity check. 1) Will you (or your organization) be transmitting or receiving syslog messages using syslog-protocol as described in the most recent ID? I got few positive respo

[Syslog] Secure substrate - need your input

Hi Folks, I'll be asking this in Vancouver but would like to get some input from the mailing list. Our charter says that we will develop a secure method to transport syslog messages. We have BEEP (RFC 3195) but it has a low implementation record. Other groups have specified BEEP as well but