Message-
From: Darren Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 5:07 AM
To: Eric Hibbard
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Syslog] Charter revision / WG obsolete?
As one of the many lurkers on this list, I have been monitoring this
WG's activities and I'm a bit concerned
Hi all,
If I get the essence in Darren's message right,
what he is proposing is to create a layered architecture for syslog.
Yes, by using what's gone before us as the way to start doing that.
Please face it: on the WG mailing list, we are pressing for ever and
ever change. More and more
As one of the many
lurkers on this list, I have been monitoring this WG's activities and I'm a bit
concerned with the recent posts. I had high hopes that some form of logging
standardization might materialize, but that now seems to be in
question.
Recent regulations
within the U.S. (e.g.,
Chris,
What I'd like to see happen is for 3195 to be broken up into 2 or
more new RFCs, one (or more) which cover the protocol and one which
defines their use over BEEP.
i.e. One which covers the COOKED profile, one which covers a RAW
profile and one which covers one or both of these over BEEP.
