Hi All,
The WG does need "Me too." comments to show consensus. If I don't see
those on the list then the issue will be dropped.
We do not have the time for lengthy discussions on any topic dealing with
syslog-protocol and syslog-transport-udp. If anyone brings up a topic,
they really need to supply appropriate text so Rainer and Anton can get on
with writing the drafts.
Thanks,
Chris
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Darren Reed wrote:
Darren,
I have seen nobody backing your position, so I think it was consensus to
ignore these comments.
And nobody decrying them either.
So are you saying, you need "me too's" on comments before you'll make
any replies to issues people bring up ?
It shouldn't take everyone to speak out about an issue for it to be
valid, it should only take one.
If 5 people came back with 5 different issues each, would you ignore
all 25 because none of them brought up the same one ? This is meant
to be the value in peer revue and if you start ignoring comments that
only get brought up once, you're undermining the efforts and
effectiveness of this group.
Darren
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
