Hi,
Overwhelming consensus is that references to 3164 will be removed from
syslog-sign.
Alex, Please start working on this but don't submit any changes until
after WGLC is complete on 28 Dec.
All: Please continue to review the document and let's get this out the
door.
Thanks,
Chris
information on
how to utilize the syslog-sign mechanism in the RFC 3164 format?
Answers can be:
__ Yes - leave it, it forms a bridge for transition,
__ No - take it out, we need to move the world along,
__ Maybe - move it to a non-normative appendix
Thanks,
Chris
-- Forwarded message
and
3164.
Thanks,
Miao
-Original Message-
From: Chris Lonvick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 10:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Syslog] RFC 3164 in syslog-sign?
Hi,
We started syslog-sign before we had Structured Data, and the
original author
PROTECTED]
Subject: [Syslog] RFC 3164 in syslog-sign?
Hi,
We started syslog-sign before we had Structured Data, and the original
author was creating a mechanism that could be used within the RFC 3164
framework. However, times have changed. We now have syslog-protocol
with
SDs.
Does the WG
