PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anton
Okmianski (aokmians)
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 12:29 PM
To: Chris Lonvick (clonvick); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Syslog] Revised proposed charter
Chris:
This is fine, but does not include all the other specific
details
Why?
Because the community implementing syslog protocol things seems to be
ignoring what the group has been doing.
This may be because they're unaware of the work or because it is being
regarded as a WTF?! and doing their own thing.
Most people seem to be ignoring 3195. Lets learn from that
I see it the other way round. If the charter can be specific, it should
be, to keep the subsequent discussion focussed on the more contentious
areas. Based on the post-Vancouver discussion, I see no alternative
to including PRI and if that is the case, then we should nail that
down now.
