it doesn't make sense
to bother doing much with a field that is mostly useless anyhow.
Rainer
> -Original Message-
> From: Glenn M. Keeni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 7:36 AM
> To: Rainer Gerhards
> Cc: Chris Lonvick; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Rainer,
I did inot get the point. Why do we have to stick to
only the facilities that are used on all platforms? Is it
that
a. all system do not use the facility codes?
e.g. system A uses facility code "12" for ntp while
system B uses nothing or, "localuse" facility code
> > The discussion came up about the use of the Facilities in the
> > -syslog-tc-mib document; are they normative or non-normative. David
> and
> > I discussed this and have concluded that they are normative to the
> > version of the protocol that we are now discussing. That may be
> changed
> >
Chris,
Chris Lonvick wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> The discussion came up about the use of the Facilities in the
> -syslog-tc-mib document; are they normative or non-normative. David and
> I discussed this and have concluded that they are normative to the
> version of the protocol that we are now dis
Chris
-protocol-21 says
" Facility and Severity values are not normative but often used."
(something I have quoted on this list before:-)
I am not sure how this fits with the changes to -mib.
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Lonvick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTE
