07 4:08 PM
To: Moehrke, John (GE Healthcare)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Syslog] 3195bis before syslog-sign
Hi John,
Is the healthcare industry using COOKED now? I can't tell from your
note
below. I'll invite all others to say if they know of any
implementations
of RFC 3195 th
igh priority as
a well implemented working replacement for BSD-Syslog.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Gerhards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 10:51 AM
> To: David Harrington
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] 3195bis before sy
t: Friday, January 26, 2007 10:51 AM
> To: David Harrington
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] 3195bis before syslog-sign
>
> Hi David,
>
> I am keeping track of 3195 implementations here:
>
> http://www.syslog.cc/ietf/rfcs/3195.html
>
> I've ju
ECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:57 PM
> To: Rainer Gerhards; 'Chris Lonvick'; 'Moehrke, John (GE Healthcare)'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] 3195bis before syslog-sign
>
> Hi Rainer,
>
> Since you have looked around already, can you
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 10:42 AM
> To: Chris Lonvick; Moehrke, John (GE Healthcare)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] 3195bis before syslog-sign
>
> Chris,
>
> I know that SDSC syslog has a partial implementation of
> COOKED (PATH is
> not covered)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:08 PM
> To: Moehrke, John (GE Healthcare)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] 3195bis before syslog-sign
>
> Hi John,
>
> Is the healthcare industry using COOKED now? I can't tell from your
> note
>
MAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
co-chair, syslog WG
> -Original Message-
> From: Moehrke, John (GE Healthcare) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 7:45 AM
> To: Eliot Lear; Chris Lonvick
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Sy
ted before you start messing around with other things. I had
thought this was the agreement of the committee last year.
John Moehrke
GE Healthcare
-Original Message-
From: Eliot Lear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:46 AM
To: Chris Lonvick
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi John,
> -Original Message-
> From: Moehrke, John (GE Healthcare) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 1:45 PM
> To: Eliot Lear; Chris Lonvick
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] 3195bis before syslog-sign
>
> The Healthcare i
> -Original Message-
> From: Eliot Lear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 11:46 AM
> To: Chris Lonvick
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Syslog] 3195bis before syslog-sign
>
> Chris & all,
>
> As you mentioned, Darre
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 11:46 +0100, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Chris & all,
>
> As you mentioned, Darren, Marshall, and I will produce an internet-draft
> that revises RFC 3195 (rfc3195bis). As part of that effort we envision
> accomplishing the following:
>
> * Obsoleting RAW and COOKED profiles.
care
> -Original Message-
> From: Eliot Lear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:46 AM
> To: Chris Lonvick
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Syslog] 3195bis before syslog-sign
>
> Chris & all,
>
> As you mentioned, Darren, M
Chris & all,
As you mentioned, Darren, Marshall, and I will produce an internet-draft
that revises RFC 3195 (rfc3195bis). As part of that effort we envision
accomplishing the following:
* Obsoleting RAW and COOKED profiles. The RAW profile has a length
limitation that we have been t
13 matches
Mail list logo
