Terminator: was Re: [Syslog] MSG encoding and content (#3, #4, #5) (fwd)

] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:10 PM Subject: Re: [Syslog] MSG encoding and content (#3, #4, #5) (fwd) Hi Folks, I asked Patrik Faltstrom to review this proposal. He has some comments below. Let's don't get hung up in his details - he has looked this over without any knowledge of our

RE: [Syslog] MSG encoding and content (#3, #4, #5) (fwd)

- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Lonvick Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Syslog] MSG encoding and content (#3, #4, #5) (fwd) Hi Folks, I asked Patrik Faltstrom to review this proposal. He has some comments below

RE: [Syslog] MSG encoding and content (#3, #4, #5) (fwd)

- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Lonvick Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Syslog] MSG encoding and content (#3, #4, #5) (fwd) Hi Folks, I asked Patrik Faltstrom to review this proposal. He has some

Re: [Syslog] MSG encoding and content (#3, #4, #5) (fwd)

PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Syslog] MSG encoding and content (#3, #4, #5) (fwd) Let's first quickly review what has been discussed on list: - current implementations sometimes use LF as a record delimiter Ok - some implementations use LF inside the MSG part Ok - some implementations