RE: [Syslog] Consensus on Charter?
Hi Darren, I suggest you work with some other implementors of TCP-based syslog to write a TCP transport mapping I-D that can be considered as the starting point for future WG work, if the current work ever gets completed. At a minimum, the document could probably be published as Informational. dbh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Reed Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 1:46 PM To: Rainer Gerhards Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Syslog] Consensus on Charter? Are we happy to recharter when these are done to cover TCP ? Darren ___ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog ___ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
Re: [Syslog] Consensus on Charter?
Are we happy to recharter when these are done to cover TCP ? Darren ___ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
RE: [Syslog] Consensus on Charter?
Darren, I am not long enough with the IETF to know how much trouble it is to recharter - but I think whatever it is, it is acceptable. You very correctly said that we need to do baby steps. And as a matter of past discussions, it seems to be necessary to explicitely exclude some things to get the first steps done. So, yes, I would accept it. Rainer -Original Message- From: Darren Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 7:46 PM To: Rainer Gerhards Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Syslog] Consensus on Charter? Are we happy to recharter when these are done to cover TCP ? Darren ___ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
