Chris,
I conceptually agree with the proposed change.
At the same time, at the risk of duplicating prior comments,
I see this allows for the HOSTNAME to reference a logical
entity which may be a subset or superset of a physical
entity. For example, foo.bar.com may easily refer to a web
I agree with Andrew,
We so often have seen those limits that we do not envision to become
limits turn into hard ones... Did you ever envision having 1 GB of
memory in your laptop...
Rainer
Maximum TIMESTAMP field length of 30 characters (that should give 4
secfrac characters if the rest of
Rainer,
OK, that sounds reasonable. The examples you give are a good ones and
probably should be included in the RFC text.
Glen
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Gerhards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 03:30
To: Marshall Glen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
Hi Rainer,
32 octets sounds good. It would probably be a good idea to put an note in
the IANA Concerns section that additional TIMESTAMP formats may be defined
as the granularity becomes more definable and is needed.
In your example, you have:
1985-04-12T18:20:50.52-0500
Shouldn't that
