syslog-protocol-01 posted comments

2004-01-21 Thread Rainer Gerhards
Hi WG, as you may have seen, the draft editor has posted protocol-01: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-01.txt First things first: this was a quick edit (while not as quick as I hoped... ;)). My main objective was to get out some text as quickly as possible. There

Updated Web Page

2004-01-21 Thread Chris Lonvick
Hi Folks, As Rainer has pointed out, we have a new version of the syslog-protocol. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-01.txt Please take the time to comment on it. Any issues we have with this MUST be resolved during the 59th IETF meeting if not before. I have

RE: syslog-protocol-01 posted comments

2004-01-21 Thread Anton Okmianski
Rainer: Good draft! I have a laundry list of suggestions/questions below. Feel free to respond to them in different emails at your convenience. The issues are in more or less section order. 1. First, I have to say I don't understand the backward compatibility aspects. RFC 3164 compliant

RE: syslog-protocol-01 posted comments

2004-01-21 Thread Rainer Gerhards
Anton: Thanks for the great feedback. I would just like to reply to one thing now, simply because it is 9:30p over here now - but that one is important for all others reviewing the draft. I should have mentioned it in my mail: I did not review section 7 and beyond yet. It seems a lot of it is