Chris
I was not, am not, quite clear what you are asking for but I am an SNMP expert
and do review MIBs and was planning to do so for the syslog MIB as and when the
protocol that the MIB is of is stable. (Be warned, when I commit to do
something, I
tend to avoid committing to a date and vice vers
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Clemm (alex)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Anton Okmianski (aokmians)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Chris Lonvick
(clonvick)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 6:50 PM
Subject: RE: [Syslog] Revised proposed cha
Tom, WG:
Comments inline...
Rainer
> [tp] Strange, I was thiinking quite the opposite, that we had
> a fragile
> consensus which disappeared in
> Vancouver and has not been refound. Looking back at the
> messages posted in the
> past few days, about what should be in the header in what
> ord
--On Friday, November 25, 2005 12:57:03 PM +0100 Rainer Gerhards
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# 8 MSG-octet counting and/or trailer is resurfacing. I think
this item is not well understood and well discussed.
We need to discuss it.
IFF we decide to do octet-counting we should put the len
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> [tp] Strange, I was thiinking quite the opposite, that we had a fragile
> consensus which disappeared in
> Vancouver and has not been refound. Looking back at the messages posted
> in the past few days, about what should be in the header in what
Chris,
Let me have a go at rewriting the charter...
> The goal of this working group is to address the security and integrity
> problems, and to standardize the syslog protocol, transport, and a select
> set of mechanisms in a manner that considers the ease of migration between
> and the co-ex
