On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 22:06 +0200, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
Hi,
I have been told that Huawei patents date back no longer than 2001. This
seems to confirm it:
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2Sect2=HITOFFp=2u
Hi Sam,
Please keep this between us for the moment.
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Sam Hartman wrote:
First, have you looked at the updated IPR disclosure?
Yes. The Cisco lawyer who deals with IPR says that he is confused by it.
He suggests that I ask for a clarification of what is based on
Hi,
OK - I blew it.
My apologies to the Working Group and to David for my obvious problem. I
had meant that to be an update to Sam only.
With sincere apologies,
Chris
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Chris Lonvick wrote:
Hi Sam,
Please keep this between us for the moment.
: [Syslog] Draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls-01.txt
Royalty-free does not generally mean free! It means you don't
charge per-end-user, per-server fee. But it does not mean
there is not fee. Plus, license terms suggest other
reasonable, non-discriminations terms and refer to
reciprocal license
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 8:39 AM
To: Rainer Gerhards
Cc: Anton Okmianski (aokmians); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Syslog] Draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls-01.txt
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 09:38 +0200, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
Hi all,
I agree with Anton on all
also do at least a little work on
it ;)
Rainer
-Original Message-
From: Chris Lonvick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Syslog] Draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls-01.txt
Hi,
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006
: [Syslog] Draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls-01.txt
Hi,
Three things:
1) Whether the patent would survive a check into prior art is not
something the IETF takes a position on:
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property
